Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34347041›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Artificial intelligence and machine learning methods in predicting anti-cancer drug combination effects.

Kunjie Fan, Lijun Cheng, Lang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multidisciplinary management gaps in cancer treatment-related skin toxicities.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. From supportive care to strategic intervention: toward a multidisciplinary approach to cutaneous adverse events in cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kunjie FanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics of The Ohio State University, 43202 Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0392-1177
Lijun ChengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics of The Ohio State University, 43202 Columbus, OH, USA.
Lang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics of The Ohio State University, 43202 Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug combinations have exhibited promising therapeutic effects in treating cancer patients with less toxicity and adverse side effects. However, it is infeasible to experimentally screen the enormous search space of all possible drug combinations. Therefore, developing computational models to efficiently and accurately identify potential anti-cancer synergistic drug combinations has attracted a lot of attention from the scientific community. Hypothesis-driven explicit mathematical methods or network pharmacology models have been popular in the last decade and have been comprehensively reviewed in previous surveys. With the surge of artificial intelligence and greater availability of large-scale datasets, machine learning especially deep learning methods are gaining popularity in the field of computational models for anti-cancer drug synergy prediction. Machine learning-based methods can be derived without strong assumptions about underlying mechanisms and have achieved state-of-the-art prediction performances, promoting much greater growth of the field. Here, we present a structured overview of available large-scale databases and machine learning especially deep learning methods in computational predictive models for anti-cancer drug synergy prediction. We provide a unified framework for machine learning models and detail existing model architectures as well as their contributions and limitations, shedding light into the future design of computational models. Besides, unbiased experiments are conducted to provide in-depth comparisons between reviewed papers in terms of their prediction performance.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAntineoplastic AgentsDatasets as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansAntineoplastic Agentscancerdeep learningdrug synergymachine learningpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34347041
PMCPMC8574962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.