ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021
Prediction of Critical Care Outcome for Adult Patients Presenting to Emergency Department Using Initial Triage Information: An XGBoost Algorithm Analysis.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence predicting emergency department dispositions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Integrating the interpretable machine learning Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) with emergency department triage to better predict 30-day mortality.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning-based prediction models for adult bowel necrosis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Reducing Mis-triage in Emergency Departments (RemEDy): Protocol for Improving Triage Accuracy Through Real-time Evaluation and Artificial Intelligence.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Optimized explainable AI and digital twin for patient flow improvement in ICU during respiratory epidemics.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Prediction of in-hospital mortality risk in cardiac arrest patients using machine learning models: a study based on the MIMIC-IV database with external validation from Yunnan University Affiliated Hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Strategy to Predict the Number of High-Acuity Children Who Leave Without Being Seen From the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Evaluating an AI Decision Support System for the Emergency Department: Retrospective Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Admission Status, Intensive Care Requirements, and Mortality in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Review
- Risk factors and predictive performance for first healthcare encounter indicating homelessness using administrative data among Calgary residents diagnosed with addiction or mental health conditions.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- A Predictive Model of Pressure Injury in Children Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting sepsis risk in emergency triage patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accurate V2X traffic prediction with deep learning architectures.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Assessing Risk in Implementing New Artificial Intelligence Triage Tools-How Much Risk is Reasonable in an Already Risky World?Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models for triage patients admitted to the intensive care unit.PloS one · 2025Article
- Using machine learning and natural language processing in triage for prediction of clinical disposition in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Inter hospital external validation of interpretable machine learning based triage score for the emergency department using common data model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning models to predict end-stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease stage 4.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Development of a population-level prediction model for intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship and mortality in older adults: A population-based cohort study.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe emergency department (ED) triage system to classify and prioritize patients from high risk to less urgent continues to be a challenge.
objectiveThis study, comprising 80,433 patients, aims to develop a machine learning algorithm prediction model of critical care outcomes for adult patients using information collected during ED triage and compare the performance with that of the baseline model using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS).
methodsTo predict the need for critical care, we used 13 predictors from triage information: age, gender, mode of ED arrival, the time interval between onset and ED arrival, reason of ED visit, chief complaints, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, oxygen saturation, and level of consciousness. The baseline model with KTAS was developed using logistic regression, and the machine learning model with 13 variables was generated using extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and deep neural network (DNN) algorithms. The discrimination was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The ability of calibration with Hosmer-Lemeshow test and reclassification with net reclassification index were evaluated. The calibration plot and partial dependence plot were used in the analysis.
resultsThe AUROC of the model with the full set of variables (0.833-0.861) was better than that of the baseline model (0.796). The XGB model of AUROC 0.861 (95% CI 0.848-0.874) showed a higher discriminative performance than the DNN model of 0.833 (95% CI 0.819-0.848). The XGB and DNN models proved better reclassification than the baseline model with a positive net reclassification index. The XGB models were well-calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P>.05); however, the DNN showed poor calibration power (Hosmer-Lemeshow test; P<.001). We further interpreted the nonlinear association between variables and critical care prediction.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that the performance of the XGB model using initial information at ED triage for predicting patients in need of critical care outperformed the conventional model with KTAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.