Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34346888›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Revealing Public Opinion Towards COVID-19 Vaccines With Twitter Data in the United States: Spatiotemporal Perspective.

Tao Hu, Siqin Wang, Wei Luo, Mengxi Zhang, Xiao Huang, Yingwei Yan, Regina Liu, Kelly Ly, Viraj Kacker, Bing She and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tao Hu *Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-8017
Siqin Wang *School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-7088
Wei Luo *Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8465-5607
Mengxi ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Health Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2996-5346
Xiao HuangDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-382X
Yingwei YanDepartment of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3487-9792
Regina LiuDepartment of Biology, Mercer University, Macon, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-9492
Kelly LyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2480-6650
Viraj KackerCollege of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6370-9143
Bing SheInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6879-0553
Zhenlong LiGeoinformation and Big Data Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-5466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a large, initially uncontrollable, public health crisis both in the United States and across the world, with experts looking to vaccines as the ultimate mechanism of defense. The development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been rapidly advancing via global efforts. Hence, it is crucial for governments, public health officials, and policy makers to understand public attitudes and opinions towards vaccines, such that effective interventions and educational campaigns can be designed to promote vaccine acceptance.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate public opinion and perception on COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. We investigated the spatiotemporal trends of public sentiment and emotion towards COVID-19 vaccines and analyzed how such trends relate to popular topics found on Twitter.

methodsWe collected over 300,000 geotagged tweets in the United States from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. We examined the spatiotemporal patterns of public sentiment and emotion over time at both national and state scales and identified 3 phases along the pandemic timeline with sharp changes in public sentiment and emotion. Using sentiment analysis, emotion analysis (with cloud mapping of keywords), and topic modeling, we further identified 11 key events and major topics as the potential drivers to such changes.

resultsAn increasing trend in positive sentiment in conjunction with a decrease in negative sentiment were generally observed in most states, reflecting the rising confidence and anticipation of the public towards vaccines. The overall tendency of the 8 types of emotion implies that the public trusts and anticipates the vaccine. This is accompanied by a mixture of fear, sadness, and anger. Critical social or international events or announcements by political leaders and authorities may have potential impacts on public opinion towards vaccines. These factors help identify underlying themes and validate insights from the analysis.

conclusionsThe analyses of near real-time social media big data benefit public health authorities by enabling them to monitor public attitudes and opinions towards vaccine-related information in a geo-aware manner, address the concerns of vaccine skeptics, and promote the confidence that individuals within a certain region or community have towards vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsPublic OpinionSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinesemotion analysispublic opinionsentiment analysistopic modelingTwitter

Identifiers

PMID34346888
PMCPMC8437406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.