Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34346887›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2021

The Psychological Experience of Frontline Perioperative Health Care Staff in Responding to COVID-19: Qualitative Study.

Toni Withiel, Elizabeth Barson, Irene Ng, Reny Segal, Daryl Lindsay Goulding Williams, Roni Benjamin Krieser, Keat Lee, Paul Mario Mezzavia, Teresa Sindoni, Yinwei Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Toni Withiel *Department of Allied Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-2760
Elizabeth BarsonDepartment of Allied Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-2579
Irene NgDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-5604
Reny SegalDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5805-5491
Daryl Lindsay Goulding WilliamsDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6987-5804
Roni Benjamin KrieserDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-5677
Keat LeeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-4676
Paul Mario MezzaviaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-1098
Teresa SindoniDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4646-7015
Yinwei ChenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7673-405X
Caroline Anne FisherDepartment of Allied Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-8526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has presented immeasurable challenges to health care workers who remain at the frontline of the pandemic. A rapidly evolving body of literature has quantitatively demonstrated significant psychological impacts of the pandemic on health care workers. However, little is known about the lived experience of the pandemic for frontline medical staff.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the qualitative experience of perioperative staff from a large trauma hospital in Melbourne, Australia.

methodsInductive thematic analysis using a critical realist approach was used to analyze data from 9 semistructured interviews.

resultsFour key themes were identified. Hospital preparedness related to the perceived readiness of the hospital to respond to the pandemic and encompassed key subthemes around communication of policy changes, team leadership, and resource availability. Perceptions of readiness contributed to the perceived psychological impacts of the pandemic, which were highly varied and ranged from anger to anxiety. A number of coping strategies were identified in response to psychological impacts which incorporated both internal and external coping mechanisms. Finally, adaptation with time reflected change and growth over time, and encompassed all other themes.

conclusionsWhile frontline staff and hospitals have rapidly marshalled a response to managing the virus, relatively less consideration was seen regarding staff mental health in our study. Findings highlight the vulnerability of health care workers in response to the pandemic and reinforce the need for a coordinated approach to managing mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19experiencegriefhealth care workerhospitalinterviewmental healthperioperativepsychologyqualitativethematic analysistrauma

Identifiers

PMID34346887
PMCPMC8483271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.