Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34346884›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2021

Ecological Momentary Assessment of Depression in People With Advanced Dementia: Longitudinal Pilot Study.

Iulia Niculescu, Hannah Quirt, Twinkle Arora, Terry Borsook, Robin Green, Brett Ford, Andrea Iaboni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iulia NiculescuDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-3247
Hannah QuirtKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-6609
Twinkle AroraKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-783X
Terry BorsookKITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5510-2923
Robin GreenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9451-3963
Brett FordDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-4447
Andrea IaboniDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-6832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarriers to assessing depression in advanced dementia include the presence of informant and patient recall biases. Ecological momentary assessment provides an improved approach for mood assessment by collecting observations in intervals throughout the day, decreasing recall bias, and increasing ecological validity.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the modified 4-item Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia for Momentary Assessment (mCSDD4-MA) tool to assess depression in patients with advanced dementia.

methodsA intensive longitudinal pilot study design was used. A total of 12 participants with advanced dementia were enrolled from an inpatient psychogeriatric unit. Participants were assessed using clinical depression assessments at admission and discharge. Research staff recorded observations four times a day for 6 weeks on phones with access to the mCSDD4-MA tool. Descriptive data related to feasibility were reported (ie, completion rates). Statistical models were used to examine the interrater reliability and construct and predictive validity of the data.

resultsOverall, 1923 observations were completed, representing 55.06% (1923/3496) of all rating opportunities with 2 raters and 66.01% (1923/2913) with at least one rater. Moderate interrater reliability was demonstrated for all items, except for lack of interest. Moderate correlations were observed between observers and patient-reported outcomes, where observers reported fewer symptoms relative to participants' self-reports. Several items were associated with and able to predict depression.

conclusionsThe mCSDD4-MA tool was feasible to use, and most items in the tool showed moderate reliability and validity for assessing depression in dementia. Repeated and real-time depression assessment in advanced dementia holds promise for the identification of clinical depression and depressive symptoms.

Indexed as

dementiadepressionecological momentary assessmenttool performance

Identifiers

PMID34346884
PMCPMC8374663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.