ArticlemSphere2021
Evolutionary and Functional Analysis of Coagulase Positivity among the Staphylococci.
Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Fourteen-Year Surveillance Study on the Microbiological Status of Raw Milk Dairy Products from Alpine Dairies in Northeastern Italy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Staphylococcal internalization into osteoblasts: a partially conserved mechanism across the genus.mBio · 2026Article
- Comparative phylogenetic, antimicrobial resistance, and clinical characterization of human spondylodiscitis-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- The Pathogenicity Mechanisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Phylogenetic Footprints of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Mammaliicoccus Isolated From Raw Caprine Milk.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Article
- Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Three Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Strains from Dogs and Humans in Egypt.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Presence and genetic variability of Staphylococcus aureus subsp. anaerobius isolated from small ruminants in Central Europe.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bacteriophage-driven emergence and expansion of Staphylococcus aureus in rodent populations.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of host adaptation by bacterial pathogens.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Role ofOpen veterinary journal · 2023Article
- Unveiling the Relevance of the Oral Cavity as aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Comparative genomics study ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- From canines to humans: Clinical importance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The bacterial genus Staphylococcus comprises a large group of pathogenic and nonpathogenic species associated with an array of host species. Staphylococci are differentiated into coagulase-positive or coagulase-negative groups based on the capacity to promote clotting of plasma, a phenotype historically associated with the ability to cause disease. However, the genetic basis of this important diagnostic and pathogenic trait across the genus has not been examined to date. Here, we selected 54 representative staphylococcal species and subspecies to examine coagulation of plasma derived from six representative host species. In total, 13 staphylococcal species mediated coagulation of plasma from at least one host species including one previously identified as coagulase negative (Staphylococcus condimenti). Comparative genomic analysis revealed that coagulase activity correlated with the presence of a gene (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.