Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34346555›Full record

SynthesisStem cells translational medicine2021

Cell therapy for nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Avnish Tripathi, Mohammad Saud Khan, Abdur Rahman Khan, Vida M Vaughn, Roberto Bolli

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cells translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mass Customized Outlook for Regenerative Heart Failure Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Avnish TripathiDivision of Cardiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.
Mohammad Saud KhanDivision of Cardiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-3226
Abdur Rahman KhanKornhauser Health Science Library, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Vida M VaughnKornhauser Health Science Library, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Roberto BolliInstitute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
University of Louisville · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Tumor Necrosis Factor Modulation of CPCsP01HL078825 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2005 to 2021
$37.6M
University of Louisville Regional Clinical Center for the CCTRNUM1HL113530 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2012 to 2018
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078825NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL113530NIH HHS P01 HL078825NIH HHS UM1 HL113530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell therapy involves transplantation of human cells to promote repair of diseased or injured tissues and/or cells. Only a limited number of mostly small-scale trials have studied cell therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of cell therapy in NICM. Electronic databases were searched for relevant RCTs from inception until August 2020. Outcomes assessed were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter or volume (LVEDD), quality of life (QoL) indices, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Weighted mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using random-effects methods. Eleven RCTs with 574 participants were included in the analysis. There was a significant increase in mean LVEF (MD, 4.17%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.66-6.69) and modest decrease in LVEDD (SMD, -0.50; 95% CI = -0.95 to -0.06) in patients treated with cell therapy compared with controls. Cell therapy was also associated with improvement in functional capacity, as assessed by the 6-minute walking distance (MD, 72.49 m; 95% CI = 3.44-141.53). No significant differences were seen in MACEs and QoL indices between treated and control groups. This meta-analysis suggests that cell therapy may improve LV systolic function and may be associated with improvement in LVEDD and functional capacity compared with maximal medical therapy. Cell therapy was safe, with no significant difference in MACEs between treatment and control groups. However, given the limitations of current studies, larger well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of cell therapy in patients with NICM.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesCardiomyopathy, DilatedCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke Volumecell therapyheart failure with reduced ejection fractionmeta-analysisnonischemic cardiomyopathysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34346555
PMCPMC8459637
OpenAlexW3190966494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.