Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34346005›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

FQHC Designation and Safety Net Patient Revenue Associated with Primary Care Practice Capabilities for Access and Quality.

Valerie A Lewis, Steven Spivack, Genevra F Murray, Hector P Rodriguez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complexity and Barriers to Vision Care: A Narrative Review Informed by a Mobile Eye Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valerie A LewisDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. lewisv@email.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-1240
Steven SpivackCenter for Outcomes and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Genevra F MurrayDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Hector P RodriguezSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkley, USA.
Boston University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

PA-20-072: Accelerating the Use of Evidence-based Innovation in Healthcare SystemsU19HS024075 · AHRQ · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MEARA, ELLEN R. · 2015 to 2021
$19.8M
The Effects of Accountable Care Organizations on Health Care DisparitiesK01AG049914 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LEWIS, VALERIE A · 2015 to 2019
$646k
AHRQ HHS 1U19HS024075AHRQ HHS T32 HS022242AHRQ HHS U19 HS024075NIA NIH HHS K01 AG049914NIA NIH HHS K01AG049914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns exist about the ability of safety net health care organizations to participate in US health care reform. Primary care practices are key to several efforts, but little is known about how capabilities of primary care practices serving a high share of disadvantaged patients compare to other practices.

objectiveTo assess capabilities around access to and quality of care among primary care practices serving a high share of Medicaid and uninsured patients compared to practices serving a low share of these patients.

designWe analyzed data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (response rate 46.8%), conducted 2017-2018.

participantsA total of 2190 medical practices with at least three adult primary care physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Our key exposures are payer mix and federally qualified health center (FQHC) designation. We classified practices as safety net if they reported a combined total of at least 25% of annual revenue from uninsured or Medicaid patients; we then further classified safety net practices into those that identified as an FQHC and those that did not. KEY

resultsFQHCs were more likely than other safety net practices and non-safety net practices to offer early or late appointments (79%, 55%, 62%; p=0.001) and weekend appointments (56%, 39%, 42%; p=0.03). FQHCs more often provided medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorders (43%, 27%, 25%; p=0.004) and behavioral health services (82%, 50%, 36%; p<0.001). FQHCs were more likely to screen patients for social and financial needs. However, FQHCs and other safety net providers had more limited electronic health record (EHR) capabilities (61%, 71%, 80%; p<0.001).

conclusionFQHCs were more likely than other types of primary care practices (both safety net practices and other practices) to possess capabilities related to access and quality. However, safety net practices were less likely than non-safety net practices to possess health information technology capabilities.

Indexed as

Medically UninsuredSafety-net ProvidersAdultHumansMedicaidPrimary Health CareUnited StatesVulnerable Populationsaccess to carefederally qualified health centersFQHCMedicaidphysician practicesprimary carequality of careSafety net

Identifiers

PMID34346005
PMCPMC8481458
OpenAlexW3189719022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.