ArticleCritical care explorations2021
Reducing Unnecessary Laboratory Utilization in the Medical ICU: A Fellow-Driven Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous imputation of blood gas and metabolic panel laboratory values in the intensive care unit using machine learning.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Evidence-Based Laboratory Testing Algorithms: A Strategic Approach to Improving Diagnostic Accuracy.Cureus · 2026Review
- Interventions to reduce low-value care in intensive care settings: a scoping review of impacts on health, resource use, costs, and the environment.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- The environmental impact of laboratory measurements in high-resource ICUs.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Cultures for acid-fast bacilli: are we being good stewards?Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Article
- A descriptive study of routine laboratory testing in intensive care unit in nearly 140,000 patient stays.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOverutilization of laboratory services is now recognized as harmful to patients and wasteful. In fact, the American Board of Internal Medicine's Choosing Wisely campaign recommends against ordering routine testing that does not answer a clinical question. Per peer benchmarking, our institution as a whole occupied an extreme outlier position at the 100th percentile for laboratory utilization. We sought to address this problem starting in our medical ICUs with a quality improvement project.
designQuality improvement project using the design, measure, analyze, improve, and control process. The primary endpoint was a sustained reduction in laboratory utilization. Counterbalance metrics were also followed, and these included mortality, renal replacement therapy initiation rates, stat laboratory orders, and central catheter-associated blood stream infections.
settingThe medical ICU at the Ohio State University Medical Center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the medical ICU from March 2019 to March 2020.
interventionsRoot causes were identified and addressed with the implementation of a wide range of interventions involving a multidisciplinary team led by trainee physicians. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsThere was a sustained 20% reduction in the number of tests performed per patient day, with no change in the counterbalance metrics.
conclusionsTrainees can affect positive change in the culture and processes at their institutions to safely reduce laboratory utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.