ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Delivery of Care through Standardized Monitoring in Children with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Dynamic Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Improving Procedural Documentation of Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Single-center Quality Improvement Study.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, antigen-driven disorder for which endoscopic monitoring and multidisciplinary care are recommended to achieve histologic remission. The EoE team at our large academic center developed a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to reduce variability in monitoring. This QI project focused on completing 3 process metrics within 6 months of diagnosis: (1) outpatient follow-up with a gastroenterologist; (2) referral to an allergist; and (3) Follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
methodsIn January 2015, our QI team developed a registry of newly diagnosed EoE patients and maintained ongoing, weekly tracking of the process measures. Interventions to increase the completion of the process metrics included educational sessions, proactive reminders to providers, and targeted communications with patient families. Missed opportunities were evaluated by more in-depth chart review and categorized as provider- or patient-driven.
resultsWe tracked 6-month process metrics from 2015 through 2018. During this interval, follow-up visit rates in GI improved from 77% to 86%, and the percentage of referrals placed to allergy increased from 65% to 77%. The percentage of patients completing a repeat EGD improved from 33% to 61%. Among patients without a repeated EGD, nearly 70% of those missed opportunities were provider-driven.
conclusionsIn patients newly diagnosed with EoE, QI interventions, including patient registry development, implementation of a local standard of care, and creating a patient tracking system, improved adherence with national EoE monitoring guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.