ArticleHeliyon2021
A survey and optical microscopy in pilot comparative analysis of generic and original nimesulide granules.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecondary to increased development of generic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), there is a lack of simple and inexpensive ways of pilot detection of differences between the batches of generic drugs and the original ones.
objectivesTo determine the peculiarities of the use of generic NSAIDs in routine practice through a pilot survey of dentists and to conduct a pilot comparative analysis of generic and original NSAIDs containing nimesulide granules using optical microscopy.
methodsThe first part of the study included a pilot survey Convenience sampling of 192 dentists to study the use of generic NSAIDs in their routine practice. The second part included the use of a pilot optical microscopy of nimesulide particles isolated from four drugs: original drug (NA) and generic ones (NB, NC, ND).
resultsIn the questionnaires, dentists pointed to a 68.7% lower clinical efficacy and a 62.6% higher percentage of side effects of generic NSAIDs compared to the original ones. Based on the results of pilot optical microscopy, a statically significant difference in the size distribution of the drug substance particles in all generic nimesulide granules was determined as follows: NB (χ
conclusionsA pilot survey of dentists showed that doctors noted the practical difference in the effects of the original and generic NSAIDs. A significant difference in the size of nimesulide particles and their distribution in generic drugs NB, NC, ND compared to the original NA suggests a possible difference in bioavailability and bioequivalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.