Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345627›Full record

ReviewmHealth2021

Wearable devices for patient monitoring in the early postoperative period: a literature review.

Tajrian Amin, Ralph J Mobbs, Niyaz Mostafa, Luke W Sy, Wen Jie Choy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733375 (Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Levothyroxine Replacement Therapy After Total Thyroidectomy Using Smart Wristband-Measured Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rhythm Parameters Versus Thyroid Function Tests), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07733375 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Levothyroxine Replacement Therapy After Total Thyroidectomy Using Smart Wristband-Measured Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rhythm Parameters Versus Thyroid Function Tests

TypeobservationalSponsorYeditepe University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsTotal Thyroidectomy, Hyperthyroidism, HypothyroidismArmsXiomi Smart Band 10
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Risk factors for rehospitalization after trauma: a follow-up study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Artificial intelligence in arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tajrian AminNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.
Ralph J MobbsNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.
Niyaz MostafaFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.
Luke W SyWearables and Gait Assessment Research (WAGAR) Group, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
Wen Jie ChoyNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early postoperative period is a crucial stage in a patient's recovery as they are susceptible to a range of complications, with detection and management the key to avoiding long term consequences. Wearable devices are an innovative way of monitoring patient's post-intervention and may translate into improved patient outcomes, and reduced strain on healthcare resources, as they may facilitate safer and earlier discharge from the hospital setting. Several recent studies have investigated the use of wearable devices in postoperative monitoring. This review outlines the current literature including the range of wearable devices used for postoperative monitoring, the variety of surgeries investigated, and the outcomes assessed. A search of five electronic databases was performed. Data on the range of wearable devices, outcomes and surgeries investigated were extracted and synoptically analysed. Twenty-four articles were retrieved. Data on several different types of surgery were available and discussed. Most studies used wrist-mounted wearable devices and accelerometers or pedometers to assess physical activity metrics, including step counts and physical activity intensity (PAI), as markers of recovery. Wearable devices can provide objective data capture in the early postoperative phase to remotely monitor patients using various metrics including temperature, cardiac monitoring and physical activity. The majority of current research is focussed on wrist-mounted accelerometers and pedometers used to assess physical activity as a marker of postoperative function. Further research is required to demonstrate improved safety and cost-effectiveness of this technology.

Indexed as

accelerometerearly postoperative monitoringphysical activity monitoringsurface sensor technologiesWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID34345627
PMCPMC8326951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.