Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345589›Full record

ArticleUrology case reports2021

Bladder stone secondary to prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

JiHun Kang

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Urology case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Giant bladder stone: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

JiHun KangDepartment of Urology, Chinjukorea Hospital, Dongjinro 2, Chinju City, 52726, South Korea.
Chinju National University of Education · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike other cavitating prostatic surgeries, prostatic urethral lift (PUL) has the advantage of being noninvasive and having fewer complications. In addition, PUL can be performed under local anesthesia and is can be performed on patients with various comorbidities. However, serious complications have been reported in some patients, so caution is required. We describe a Case of a bladder stone as a complication after PUL surgery. To our knowledge, large bladder stone following prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a unique complication not previously described in the literature.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)Bladder stoneProstatic urethral lift (PUL)

Identifiers

PMID34345589
PMCPMC8319443
OpenAlexW3185668548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.