Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345572›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021

Applicant Preferences for Virtual Interviews: Insights from the 2020-21 Integrated Plastic Surgery Application Cycle.

Kshipra Hemal, Benjamin A Sarac, Carter J Boyd, Christopher M Runyan, Amanda A Gosman, Jeffrey E Janis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preference Signaling: Does It Work? A MultispecialtyReview of the Data.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent Trends and Future Directions for the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceptions of a virtual interview process for pharmacy residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multisite survey of residency candidates, preceptors, and residency program directors.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Use of Tele-Education in Medicine, During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Commentary.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kshipra HemalDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, N.C.
Benjamin A SaracThe Ohio State University Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Columbus, Ohio.
Carter J BoydHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, N.Y.
Christopher M RunyanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, N.C.
Amanda A GosmanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of San Diego, San Diego, Calif.
Jeffrey E JanisThe Ohio State University Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented residency application cycle that required the use of virtual interviews. The inaugural class of applicants participating in virtual interviews were surveyed concerning their preferences and suggestions for future application cycles.

methodsA survey was distributed to 349 individuals who applied for an integrated plastic surgery residency position at three institutions during the 2020-21 application cycle. Responses were analyzed to determine the most popular attributes of virtual interviews.

resultsResponse rate was 44%. Eighty-six percent of applicants valued having time to consider their interview offers before scheduling; however, nearly one-third felt the instructions provided by programs lacked clarity and did not abide by the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons guidelines. Eighty-two percent of applicants valued having a preinterview social, and most preferred smaller breakout rooms organized by themes. A short interview day (less than three hours) was associated with less applicant familiarity with the program, its people, and its location when compared with medium (three to seven hours) and long (more than seven hours) interview days (

conclusionsThe virtual interview format can be optimized in many ways to benefit both applicants and programs. The data presented in this article provide suggestions for future iterations of virtual interviews.

Identifiers

PMID34345572
PMCPMC8322511
OpenAlexW3191453424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.