Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345566›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Efficacy of Pitolisant on the Treatment of Narcolepsy: A Systematic Review.

Stephanie P Fabara, Juan Fernando Ortiz, Anas Anas Sohail, Jessica Hidalgo, Abbas Altamimi, Belen Tama, Urvish K Patel

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A real-world study on the treatment of pediatric narcolepsy with pitolisant in China.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Reciprocal regulation of the HbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephanie P FabaraGeneral Medicine, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, ECU.
Juan Fernando OrtizNeurology, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, ECU.
Anas Anas SohailMedicine, Aureus University School of Medicine, Oranjestad, ABW.
Jessica HidalgoInternal Medicine, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, ECU.
Abbas AltamimiEmergency Medicine, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, KWT.
Belen TamaMedicine, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, ECU.
Urvish K PatelPublic Health and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · ECLarkin Community Hospital · USUniversisdad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil · ECUniversity of Aruba · AW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narcolepsy is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy. Histamine neurons play an important role in enhancing wakefulness. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, in patients with a high burden of narcolepsy symptoms. We conducted an advanced PubMed search strategy with inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcome included the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and adverse effects frequency. Our primary outcome included the mean ESS score at the endpoint and showed that pitolisant was superior to the placebo, but not non-inferior to modafinil. Adverse effects were less common and shorter in duration in the pitolisant group compared to the modafinil-treated patients. Pitolisant was efficacious in reducing excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy compared with placebo, and it was well-tolerated in patients with severe narcolepsy symptoms as compared with modafinil.

Indexed as

clinical trialsefficacymodafinilnarcolepsypitolisant

Identifiers

PMID34345566
PMCPMC8325524
OpenAlexW3176479996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.