Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345375›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2021

Detecting Task Difficulty of Learners in Colonoscopy: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.

Liu Xin, Zheng Bin, Duan Xiaoqin, He Wenjing, Li Yuandong, Zhao Jinyu, Zhao Chen, Wang Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Review
  4. Eye tracking technology in endoscopy: Looking to the future.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liu XinSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Zheng BinSurgical Simulation Research Lab, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Duan XiaoqinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jilin University Second Hospital, Changchun, Jilin, China.
He WenjingDepartment of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Li YuandongDepartment of Surgery, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Zhao JinyuSurgical Simulation Research Lab, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Zhao ChenSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Wang LinSurgical Simulation Research Lab, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CASecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNShanxi Academy of Medical Sciences · CNUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Science and Technology Beijing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye-tracking can help decode the intricate control mechanism in human performance. In healthcare, physicians-in-training require extensive practice to improve their healthcare skills. When a trainee encounters any difficulty in the practice, they will need feedback from experts to improve their performance. Personal feedback is time-consuming and subjected to bias. In this study, we tracked the eye movements of trainees during their colonoscopic performance in simulation. We examined changes in eye movement behavior during the moments of navigation loss (MNL), a signature sign for task difficulty during colonoscopy, and tested whether deep learning algorithms can detect the MNL by feeding data from eye-tracking. Human eye gaze and pupil characteristics were learned and verified by the deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGANs); the generated data were fed to the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks with three different data feeding strategies to classify MNLs from the entire colonoscopic procedure. Outputs from deep learning were compared to the expert's judgment on the MNLs based on colonoscopic videos. The best classification outcome was achieved when we fed human eye data with 1000 synthesized eye data, where accuracy (91.80%), sensitivity (90.91%), and specificity (94.12%) were optimized. This study built an important foundation for our work of developing an education system for training healthcare skills using simulation.

Indexed as

colonoscopyDeep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGANs)eye-trackingLong Short-Term Memory (LSTM)navigationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID34345375
PMCPMC8327395
OpenAlexW3181760676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.