Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345236›Full record

ReviewEXCLI journal2021

Privacy considerations for sharing genomics data.

Marie Oestreich, Dingfan Chen, Joachim L Schultze, Mario Fritz, Matthias Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EXCLI journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Toward security-aware portable sequencing.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genomic medicine advances for brain tumors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tackling neurodegenerationFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  14. BioChainReward: A Secure and Incentivised Blockchain Framework for Biomedical Data Sharing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie OestreichSystems Medicine, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Venusberg-Campus 1/99, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Dingfan ChenCISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany, Stuhlsatzenhaus 5, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Joachim L SchultzeSystems Medicine, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Venusberg-Campus 1/99, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Mario FritzCISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Saarbrücken, Germany, Stuhlsatzenhaus 5, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Matthias BeckerSystems Medicine, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Venusberg-Campus 1/99, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7120-4508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing amount of attention has been geared towards understanding the privacy risks that arise from sharing genomic data of human origin. Most of these efforts have focused on issues in the context of genomic sequence data, but the popularity of techniques for collecting other types of genome-related data has prompted researchers to investigate privacy concerns in a broader genomic context. In this review, we give an overview of different types of genome-associated data, their individual ways of revealing sensitive information, the motivation to share them as well as established and upcoming methods to minimize information leakage. We further discuss the concise threats that are being posed, who is at risk, and how the risk level compares to potential benefits, all while addressing the topic in the context of modern technology, methodology, and information sharing culture. Additionally, we will discuss the current legal situation regarding the sharing of genomic data in a selection of countries, evaluating the scope of their applicability as well as their limitations. We will finalize this review by evaluating the development that is required in the scientific field in the near future in order to improve and develop privacy-preserving data sharing techniques for the genomic context.

Indexed as

data privacydata sharingepigenomic datagenomic datatranscriptomic data

Identifiers

PMID34345236
PMCPMC8326502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.