Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345170›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2021

Clinical Evolution and Quality of Life in Clinically Based COPD Chronic Bronchitic and Emphysematous Phenotypes: Results from the 1-Year Follow-Up of the STORICO Italian Observational Study.

Francesco Blasi, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Pietro Schino, Giuseppina Cuttitta, Alessandro Zullo, Alessandra Ori, Nicola Scichilone, STORICO study group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03105999 (Observational Study On The Characterization Of 24-Hour Symptoms In Patients With COPD), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03105999 completednot on this map

Observational Study On The Characterization Of 24-Hour Symptoms In Patients With COPD

TypeobservationalSponsorLaboratori Guidotti S.p.A.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled683ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco BlasiInternal Medicine Department, Respiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, 20122, Italy.
Raffaele Antonelli IncalziUniversity Biomedical Campus of Rome, Rome, 00128, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2100-2075
Giorgio Walter CanonicaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Pietro SchinoMiulli Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, 70021, Italy.
Giuseppina CuttittaNational Research Council, Palermo, 90146, Italy.
Alessandro ZulloMedineos Observational Research, Modena, 41123, Italy.
Alessandra OriMedineos Observational Research, Modena, 41123, Italy.
Nicola ScichiloneDIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, 90127, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-6573
STORICO study group
Humanitas University · ITNational Research Council · ITOspedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding clinical evolution of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is crucial for improving disease management. Materials and Methods: STORICO (NCT03105999), an Italian, multicenter, non-interventional, observational study conducted in 40 pulmonology centers, aimed to describe the 1-year clinical evolution and health status of clinicallbased phenotypes. Baseline and follow-up data of COPD subjects with a chronic bronchitis (CB) or emphysema (EM) phenotype were collected. The frequency of COPD symptoms during the 24 hours (gathered via the night-time, morning and day-time symptoms of COPD questionnaire) and the anxiety and depression levels (via the HADS Scale) were recorded at each visit. Results: A total of 261 CB and 159 EM patients were analyzed. CB patients with ≥1 night-time symptom seemed to be more frequent (51.7%, 41.8% and 41.4% at baseline, 6-month and 12-month follow-up, respectively) than EM (37.7%, 32.1% and 30.2% at study visits) even if no statistical differences were observed at time points between phenotypes (chi-square test p-values presence/absence of night-time symptoms in CB vs EM at study visits >0.0007). In the first 6 months, the frequency of patients with ≥1 night-time symptom decreased of 9.9% in CB and of 5.6% in EM. A clinically relevant decline of DLCO % predicted over 1 year in EM was observed, the mean (SD) being 61.5 (20.8) % at baseline and 59.1 (17.4) % at 12-month follow-up. EM had higher levels of anxiety and depression than CB (median (25th-75th percentile) HADS total score in CB: 7.0 (4.0-13.0) and 7.0 (3.0-12.0), in EM: 9.0 (3.0-14.0) and 9.5 (3.0-14.0) both at baseline and at 6-month follow-up, respectively), considering 1.17 as minimally clinical important difference (MCID) for the total score. Conclusion: EM patients, evaluated in a real-world setting, seem to suffer from a worse clinical condition and health status compared to CB patients, appearing to have "more treatable" traits.

Indexed as

Bronchitis, ChronicEmphysemaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyPhenotypeQuality of Lifeclinical evolutionclinical phenotypeCOPDquality of life

Identifiers

PMID34345170
PMCPMC8325060
OpenAlexW3184615184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.