Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34345009›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2021

A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue.

Anna Petherick, Rafael Goldszmidt, Eduardo B Andrade, Rodrigo Furst, Thomas Hale, Annalena Pott, Andrew Wood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Mechanics of pandemics.EClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The psychological ability to adopt recommended coping responses reduced infections during the COVID-19 pandemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna Petherick *Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. anna.petherick@bsg.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8678-4456
Rafael Goldszmidt *Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE), Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-6063
Eduardo B AndradeBrazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE), Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-8151
Rodrigo FurstBrazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE), Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1542-3212
Thomas HaleBlavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8871-3376
Annalena PottDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-4755
Andrew WoodDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-0824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic lingers, the possibility of 'pandemic fatigue' has raised worldwide concerns. Here, we examine whether there was a gradual reduction in adherence to protective behaviours against COVID-19 from March through December 2020, as hypothesized in expectations of fatigue. We considered self-report behaviours from representative samples of the populations of 14 countries (N = 238,797), as well as mobility and policy data for 124 countries. Our results show that changes in adherence were empirically meaningful and geographically widespread. While a low-cost and habituating behaviour (mask wearing) exhibited a linear rise in adherence, high-cost and sensitizing behaviours (physical distancing) declined, but this decline decelerated over time, with small rebounds seen in later months. Reductions in adherence to physical distancing showed little difference across societal groups, but were less intense in countries with high interpersonal trust. Alternative underlying mechanisms and policy implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCOVID-19Global HealthHealth PolicyHumansInfection ControlMasksPatient CompliancePhysical DistancingSelf ReportSocioeconomic FactorsTrust

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.