Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344991›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2022

Assessment of pregnancy dietary intake and association with maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Jole Costanza, Margherita Camanni, Maria Maddalena Ferrari, Valentina De Cosmi, Silvia Tabano, Laura Fontana, Tatjana Radaelli, Giulia Privitera, Daniela Alberico, Patrizia Colapietro and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jole CostanzaResearch Laboratories Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Margherita CamanniResearch Laboratories Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Maria Maddalena FerrariUnit of Obstetric, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate "L. Mangiagalli", Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Valentina De CosmiPediatric Intermediate Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Silvia TabanoLaboratory of Medical Genetics, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Laura FontanaResearch Laboratories Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Tatjana RadaelliUnit of Obstetric, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate "L. Mangiagalli", Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giulia PriviteraUnit of Obstetric, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate "L. Mangiagalli", Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Daniela AlbericoUnit of Obstetric, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate "L. Mangiagalli", Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia ColapietroDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Silvia MottaResearch Laboratories Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Silvia SirchiaMedical Genetics, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Tamara StampalijaUnit of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Chiara TabassoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Paola RoggeroDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ParazziniUnit of Obstetric, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate "L. Mangiagalli", Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Fabio MoscaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Enrico FerrazziUnit of Obstetric, Department of Woman, Child and Neonate "L. Mangiagalli", Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Silvano BosariScientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Monica MiozzoResearch Laboratories Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. monica.miozzo@unimi.it.
Carlo AgostoniPediatric Intermediate Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal dietary habits are contributors of maternal and fetal health; however, available data are heterogeneous and not conclusive.

methodsNutrient intake during pregnancy was assessed in 503 women with uncomplicated pregnancies, using the validated Food Frequency Questionnaire developed by the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-FFQ).

resultsIn all, 68% of women had a normal body mass index at the beginning of pregnancy, and 83% of newborns had an appropriate weight for gestational age. Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and placental weight were independently correlated with birth weight. GWG was not related to the pre-pregnancy BMI. EPIC-FFQ evaluation showed that 30% of women adhered to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) ranges for macronutrient intake. In most pregnant women (98.1%), consumption of water was below recommendations. Comparing women with intakes within EFSA ranges for macronutrients with those who did not, no differences were found in BMI, GWG, and neonatal or placental weight. Neither maternal nor neonatal parameters were associated with the maternal dietary profiles.

conclusionsIn our population, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, GWG, and placental weight are determinants of birth weight percentile, while no association was found with maternal nutrition. Future studies should explore associations through all infancy. IMPACT: Maternal anthropometrics and nutrition status may affect offspring birth weight. In 503 healthy women, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and placental weight were independently correlated to neonatal birth weight. GWG was not related to the pre-pregnancy BMI. In all, 30% of women respected the EFSA ranges for macronutrients. Neither maternal nor neonatal parameters were associated with maternal dietary profiles considered in this study. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, GWG, and placental weight are determinants of neonatal birth weight percentile, while a connection with maternal nutrition profiles was not found.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainWeight GainBirth WeightBody Mass IndexEatingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34344991
PMCPMC9270222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.