Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344883›Full record

ReviewNature communications2021

The search for lunar mantle rocks exposed on the surface of the Moon.

Daniel P Moriarty, Nick Dygert, Sarah N Valencia, Ryan N Watkins, Noah E Petro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oxygen isotope identity of the Earth and Moon with implications for the formation of the Moon and source of volatiles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A lunar sample renaissance.Nature communications · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel P MoriartyNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA. daniel.p.moriarty@nasa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-2337
Nick DygertDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Sarah N ValenciaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
Ryan N WatkinsPlanetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Noah E PetroNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-077X
Goddard Space Flight Center · USPlanetary Science Institute · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

NASA | Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center) 80GSFC21M0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lunar surface is ancient and well-preserved, recording Solar System history and planetary evolution processes. Ancient basin-scale impacts excavated lunar mantle rocks, which are expected to remain present on the surface. Sampling these rocks would provide insight into fundamental planetary processes, including differentiation and magmatic evolution. There is contention among lunar scientists as to what lithologies make up the upper lunar mantle, and where they may have been exposed on the surface. We review dynamical models of lunar differentiation in the context of recent experiments and spacecraft data, assessing candidate lithologies, their distribution, and implications for lunar evolution.

Identifiers

PMID34344883
PMCPMC8333336
OpenAlexW3189059404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.