Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344881›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Charge of clustered microparticles measured in spatial plasma afterglows follows the smallest enclosing sphere model.

B van Minderhout, J C A van Huijstee, R M H Rompelberg, A Post, A T A Peijnenburg, P Blom, J Beckers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B van MinderhoutDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. b.v.minderhout@tue.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-9704
J C A van HuijsteeDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-3414
R M H RompelbergDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
A PostDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1903-285X
A T A PeijnenburgVDL Enabling Technologies Group, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
P BlomVDL Enabling Technologies Group, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J BeckersDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. j.beckers@tue.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-7013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plasma-induced charge of non-spherical microparticles is a crucial parameter in complex plasma physics, aerosol science and astrophysics. Yet, the literature describes this charge by two competing models, neither of which has been experimentally verified or refuted. Here we offer experimental proof that the charge on a two-particle cluster (doublet) in the spatial afterglow of a low-pressure plasma equals the charge that would be obtained by the smallest enclosing sphere and that it should therefore not be based on its geometrical capacitance but rather on the capacitance of its smallest enclosing sphere. To support this conclusion, the size, mass and charge of single particles (singlets) and doublets are measured with high precision. The measured ratio between the plasma-afterglow-induced charges on doublets and singlets is compared to both models and shows perfect agreement with the predicted ratio using the capacitance of the smallest enclosing sphere, while being significantly dissimilar to the predicted ratio based on the particle's geometrical capacitance.

Identifiers

PMID34344881
PMCPMC8333332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.