Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344848›Full record

SynthesisJournal of biosciences2021

Effects of yogic intervention on pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength parameters: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Preeti Bhagel, Mantu Saha

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Yogic Breathing Practices a Non-Pharmacological Alternative Medicine for Managing Pulmonary Functions of Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Yoga and pain: A mind-body complex system.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Preeti BhagelExercise Physiology and Yoga Laboratory, Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), DRDO, Delhi, India.
Mantu Saha
Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of yogic intervention (YI) on pulmonary functions (PFs) and respiratory muscle strength parameters in healthy individuals. PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, SPORTdiscus databases as well as manual searches carried out until March 2020 on yoga AND pulmonary function were included based on Prisma guidelines. Twenty studies were identified potentially relevant. They were systematically reviewed and summarized in tabular form, listing yogic intervention (YI) significant improved forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1); FEV1/FVC; peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), maximum voluntary volume (MVV), respiratory muscle strength parameters like maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP or PEmax). There are encouraging results elucidated that yogic intervention improves pulmonary functions and respiratory muscle strength parameters of healthy physically fit individuals significantly.

Indexed as

YogaCase-Control StudiesHumansLungMuscle StrengthRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory Muscles

Identifiers

PMID34344848
OpenAlexW3191488107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.