Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344405›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Biochemical and molecular features of Chinese patients with glutaric acidemia type 1 detected through newborn screening.

Yiming Lin, Wenjun Wang, Chunmei Lin, Zhenzhu Zheng, Qingliu Fu, Weilin Peng, Dongmei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogenic Analysis of TwoInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  3. Brain morphometry and cognition in late-onset glutaric aciduria type 1: scoping review and novel insights from a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical features andMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiming LinCenter of Neonatal Disease Screening, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Wenjun WangHangzhou Biosan Clinical Laboratory, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chunmei LinCenter of Neonatal Disease Screening, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Zhenzhu ZhengCenter of Neonatal Disease Screening, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Qingliu FuCenter of Neonatal Disease Screening, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China.
Weilin PengCenter of Neonatal Disease Screening, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China. wellpeng@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3921-6119
Dongmei ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, 700 Fengze Street, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian Province, China. chendm9090@163.com.
Maternity and Children's Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlutaric acidemia type 1 (GA1) is a treatable disorder affecting cerebral organic acid metabolism caused by a defective glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GCDH) gene. GA1 diagnosis reports following newborn screening (NBS) are scarce in the Chinese population. This study aimed to assess the acylcarnitine profiles and genetic characteristics of patients with GA1 identified through NBS.

resultsFrom January 2014 to September 2020, 517,484 newborns were screened by tandem mass spectrometry, 102 newborns with elevated glutarylcarnitine (C5DC) levels were called back. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with GA1, including 11 neonatal GA1 and two maternal GA1 patients. The incidence of GA1 in the Quanzhou region was estimated at 1 in 47,044 newborns. The initial NBS results showed that all but one of the patients had moderate to markedly increased C5DC levels. Notably, one neonatal patient with low free carnitine (C0) level suggest primary carnitine deficiency (PCD) but was ultimately diagnosed as GA1. Nine neonatal GA1 patients underwent urinary organic acid analyses: eight had elevated GA and 3HGA levels, and one was reported to be within the normal range. Ten distinct GCDH variants were identified. Eight were previously reported, and two were newly identified. In silico prediction tools and protein modeling analyses suggested that the newly identified variants were potentially pathogenic. The most common variant was c.1244-2 A>C, which had an allelic frequency of 54.55% (12/22), followed by c.1261G>A (p.Ala421Thr) at 9.09% (2/22).

conclusionsNeonatal GA1 patients with increased C5DC levels can be identified through NBS. Maternal GA1 patients can also be detected using NBS due to the low C0 levels in their infants. Few neonatal GA1 patients may have atypical acylcarnitine profiles that are easy to miss during NBS; therefore, multigene panel testing should be performed in newborns with low C0 levels. This study indicates that the GCDH variant spectra were heterogeneous in this southern Chinese cohort.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsBrain Diseases, MetabolicChinaGlutaryl-CoA DehydrogenaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningGlutaryl-CoA Dehydrogenasefree carnitineGCDH geneGlutaric acidemia type 1newborn screeningprimary carnitine deficiency

Identifiers

PMID34344405
PMCPMC8335863
OpenAlexW3190315202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.