Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344399›Full record

Trial reportOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Long-term efficacy and safety of sapropterin in patients who initiated sapropterin at < 4 years of age with phenylketonuria: results of the 3-year extension of the SPARK open-label, multicentre, randomised phase IIIb trial.

Ania C Muntau, Alberto Burlina, François Eyskens, Peter Freisinger, Vincenzo Leuzzi, Hatice Serap Sivri, Gwendolyn Gramer, Renata Pazdírková, Maureen Cleary, Amelia S Lotz-Havla and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Ania C MuntauUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. muntau@uke.de.
Alberto BurlinaUniversity Hospital, Padua, Italy.
François EyskensUniversitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Peter FreisingerChildren's Hospital Kreiskliniken, Reutlingen, Germany.
Vincenzo LeuzziUniversita La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Hatice Serap SivriHacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Gwendolyn GramerDivision for Neuropaediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Renata PazdírkováDepartment of Children and Adolescents, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Maureen ClearyGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Amelia S Lotz-HavlaDr. Von Hauner Children's Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Paul LaneBioMarin Europe Ltd., London, UK.
Ignacio AlvarezBioMarin Europe Ltd., London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2900-8378
Frank RutschMuenster University Children's Hospital, Muenster, Germany.
BioMarin (United Kingdom) · GBAntwerp University Hospital · BECharles University · CZGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBHacettepe University · TRHeidelberg University · DEKreiskliniken Reutlingen · DESapienza University of Rome · ITUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the initial 26-week SPARK (Safety Paediatric efficAcy phaRmacokinetic with Kuvan®) study, addition of sapropterin dihydrochloride (Kuvan®; a synthetic formulation of the natural cofactor for phenylalanine hydroxylase, tetrahydrobiopterin; BH

resultsAll 51 patients who completed the 26-week SPARK study period entered the extension period. Patients who were previously treated with a Phe-restricted diet only ('sapropterin extension' group; n = 26), were initiated on sapropterin at 10 mg/kg/day, which could be increased up to 20 mg/kg/day. Patients previously treated with sapropterin plus Phe-restricted diet, remained on this regimen in the extension period ('sapropterin continuous' group; n = 25). Dietary Phe tolerance increased significantly at the end of the study versus baseline (week 0), by 38.7 mg/kg/day in the 'sapropterin continuous' group (95% CI 28.9, 48.6; p < 0.0001). In the 'sapropterin extension' group, a less pronounced effect was observed, with significant differences versus baseline (week 27) only observed between months 9 and 21; dietary Phe tolerance at the end of study increased by 5.5 mg/kg/day versus baseline (95% CI - 2.8, 13.8; p = 0.1929). Patients in both groups had normal neuromotor development and growth parameters.

conclusionsLong-term treatment with sapropterin plus a Phe-restricted diet in patients who initiated sapropterin at < 4 years of age with BH

Indexed as

Phenylalanine HydroxylasePhenylketonuriasBiopterinsChildChild, PreschoolHumansPhenylalanineBiopterinsPhenylalaninePhenylalanine HydroxylasesapropterinHyperphenylalaninaemiaInfantsPhenylketonuriaSapropterin dihydrochlorideTherapy recommendations

Identifiers

PMID34344399
PMCPMC8335897
OpenAlexW3189564208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.