Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344386›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Feasibility, reliability and validity of the health-related quality of life instrument Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) among school-aged children and adolescents in Sweden.

Kristina Lindvall, Masoud Vaezghasemi, Inna Feldman, Anneli Ivarsson, Katherine J Stevens, Solveig Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Empirical comparison of health-related quality of life and subjective well-being measures in Australian adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L and CHU9D in children and adolescents: a measurement property study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina LindvallDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. kristina.lindvall@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-611X
Masoud VaezghasemiDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0791-0256
Inna FeldmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3329-6066
Anneli IvarssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Katherine J StevensSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9018-6413
Solveig PetersenDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-2430
Umeå University · SEUniversity of Sheffield · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted in a general population of schoolchildren in Sweden, with the aim to assess the psychometric properties of a generic preference-based health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, the Swedish Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D), among schoolchildren aged 7-15 years, and in subgroups aged 7-9, 10-12 and 13-15 years.

methodsIn total, 486 school aged children, aged 7-15 years, completed a questionnaire including the CHU9D, the Pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL), KIDSCREEN-10, questions on general health, long-term illness, and sociodemographic characteristics. Psychometric testing was undertaken of feasibility, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, factorial validity, concurrent validity, convergent validity and divergent validity.

resultsThe CHU9D evidenced very few missing values, minimal ceiling, and no floor effects. The instrument achieved satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's Alfa > 0.7) and strong test-retest reliability (r > 0.6). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the proposed one-factor structure of the CHU9D. For child algorithm, RMSEA = 0.05, CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, and SRMR = 0.04. For adult algorithm RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, and SRMR = 0.04. The CHU9D utility value correlated moderately or strongly with KIDSCREEN-10 and PedsQL total scores (r > 0.5-0.7). The CHU9D discriminated as anticipated on health and on three of five sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, and custody arrangement, but not socioeconomic status and ethnic origin).

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that the Swedish CHU9D is a feasible, reliable and valid measure of preference-based HRQoL in children. The study furthermore suggests that the CHU9D is appropriate for use among children 7-15 years of age in the general population, as well as among subgroups aged 7- 9, 10-12 and 13-15 years.

Indexed as

Child HealthQuality of LifeAdolescentChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenAdolescentChildCHU9DHealth related quality of lifeHRQoLPsychometricsSweden

Identifiers

PMID34344386
PMCPMC8336397
OpenAlexW3191173103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.