Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344382›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

The factors influencing clinician use of hypertension guidelines in different resource settings: a qualitative study investigating clinicians' perspectives and experiences.

Amelia Kataria Golestaneh, Jonathan M Clarke, Nicholas Appelbaum, Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalvez, Arun P Jose, Richu Philip, Neil R Poulter, Thomas Beaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Impact of Antihypertensive De-escalation: A Secondary Analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Management of Hypertension in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Structured Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amelia Kataria GolestanehDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, St Dunstan's Road, W6 8RP, London, UK.
Jonathan M ClarkeCentre for Mathematics of Precision Healthcare, Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas AppelbaumInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Carmen Rodriguez GonzalvezInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Arun P JoseCentre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Richu PhilipDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, St Dunstan's Road, W6 8RP, London, UK.
Neil R PoulterImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Thomas BeaneyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, St Dunstan's Road, W6 8RP, London, UK. Thomas.beaney@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9709-7264

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension accounts for the greatest burden of disease worldwide, yet hypertension awareness and control rates are suboptimal, especially within low- and middle-income countries. Guidelines can enable consistency of care and improve health outcomes. A small body of studies investigating clinicians' perceptions and implementation of hypertension guidelines exists, mostly focussed on higher income settings. This study aims to explore how hypertension guidelines are used by clinicians across different resource settings, and the factors influencing their use.

methodsA qualitative approach was employed using convenience sampling and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Seventeen medical doctors were interviewed over video or telephone call from March to August 2020. Two clinicians worked in low-income countries, ten in middle-income countries, and five in high-income countries. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded inductively. Reflexive thematic analysis was used.

resultsThemes were generated at three levels at which clinicians perceived influencing factors to be operating: healthcare worker, healthcare worker interactions with patients, and the wider health system. Within each level, influencing factors were described as barriers to and facilitators of guideline use. Variation in factors occurred across income settings. At the healthcare worker level, usability of guidelines, trust in guidelines, attitudes and views about guidelines' purpose, and relevance to patient populations were identified as themes. Influencing factors at the health system level were accessibility of equipment and medications, workforce, and access to healthcare settings. Influences at the patient level were clinician perceived patient motivation and health literacy, and access to, and cost of treatment, although these represented doctors' perceptions rather than patient perceived factors.

conclusionsThis study adds a high level global view to previous studies investigating clinician perspectives on hypertension guideline use. Guidelines should be evidence-based, regularly updated and attention should be given to increasing applicability to LMICs and a range of healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHypertensionDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchWorkforceClinical guidelinesGuideline useHypertension

Identifiers

PMID34344382
PMCPMC8336017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.