Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344334›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Exploring healthcare students' interprofessional teamwork in primary care simulation scenarios: collaboration to create a shared treatment plan.

Lene Lunde, Anne Moen, Rune B Jakobsen, Elin O Rosvold, Anja M Brænd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lene LundeDepartment of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. lene.lunde@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-3950
Anne MoenDepartment of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-9355
Rune B JakobsenDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3566-9516
Elin O RosvoldDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-5323
Anja M BrændDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-7555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers assume responsibility for patients with increasingly complex problems requiring interprofessional collaboration. Introducing interprofessional education in healthcare curricula prepares healthcare students for this reality. Solving simulation scenarios as an educational strategy is promoted to support interprofessional education in health care, and is mostly used in acute clinical situations. This paper aims to explore how healthcare students' actions influence interprofessional collaboration and treatment plan identification when they solve common, sub-acute patient scenarios in primary care situations.

methodsInteraction analysis of video recordings from the simulation scenarios was performed with a focus on the students' joint actions; specifically how these actions unfold and how productive the students were in terms of developing treatment plans.

resultsWe found variation in the groups' interactions, the paths they followed, and the quality of their knowledge output in their shared treatment plan. The groups with the capacity to collaborate and engage in sharing information, and explain and elaborate on concepts, were more successful in developing comprehensive treatment plans. Furthermore, these groups managed the duality of defining and solving the immediate problem and collaboratively preparing for future care.

conclusionsAnalysis of the activities in our scenarios showed the students' potential to practice interprofessional collaboration. Our study illustrates that simulation of sub-acute scenarios in primary care is an underexplored but suitable arena to train communication and teamwork in complex situations. The simulation scenarios are also feasible for use on-site in an educational facility or in practice with minimal equipment and resources.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsStudents, NursingAttitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorHumansPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareHealthcare studentsInteractionInterprofessional educationPrimary careSimulation

Identifiers

PMID34344334
PMCPMC8336096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.