Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344323›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2021

Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments.

Emmanuelle Sophie Briolat, Lina María Arenas, Anna E Hughes, Eric Liggins, Martin Stevens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Background selection for camouflage shifts in accordance with color change in an intertidal prawn.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  7. Perch choice and substrate matching to the dorsal patterns ofBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  8. Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuelle Sophie BriolatCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, TR10 9FE, Penryn, UK. esb204@exeter.ac.uk.
Lina María ArenasCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, TR10 9FE, Penryn, UK.
Anna E HughesCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, TR10 9FE, Penryn, UK.
Eric Liggins, QinetiQ, Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, GU14 0LX, Hampshire, UK.
Martin StevensCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, TR10 9FE, Penryn, UK.
University of Exeter · GBQinetiq (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P018319/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrypsis by background-matching is a critical form of anti-predator defence for animals exposed to visual predators, but achieving effective camouflage in patchy and variable natural environments is not straightforward. To cope with heterogeneous backgrounds, animals could either specialise on particular microhabitat patches, appearing cryptic in some areas but mismatching others, or adopt a compromise strategy, providing partial matching across different patch types. Existing studies have tested the effectiveness of compromise strategies in only a limited set of circumstances, primarily with small targets varying in pattern, and usually in screen-based tasks. Here, we measured the detection risk associated with different background-matching strategies for relatively large targets, with human observers searching for them in natural scenes, and focusing on colour. Model prey were designed to either 'specialise' on the colour of common microhabitat patches, or 'generalise' by matching the average colour of the whole visual scenes.

resultsIn both the field and an equivalent online computer-based search task, targets adopting the generalist strategy were more successful in evading detection than those matching microhabitat patches. This advantage occurred because, across all possible locations in these experiments, targets were typically viewed against a patchwork of different microhabitat areas; the putatively generalist targets were thus more similar on average to their various immediate surroundings than were the specialists.

conclusionsDemonstrating close agreement between the results of field and online search experiments provides useful validation of online citizen science methods commonly used to test principles of camouflage, at least for human observers. In finding a survival benefit to matching the average colour of the visual scenes in our chosen environment, our results highlight the importance of relative scales in determining optimal camouflage strategies, and suggest how compromise coloration can succeed in nature.

Indexed as

PigmentationPredatory BehaviorAnimalsEnvironmentHumansSpecializationVisual PerceptionAnti-predator colorationBackground matchingCamouflageCitizen scienceCrypsisDetection risk

Identifiers

PMID34344323
PMCPMC8330473
OpenAlexW3190479722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.