Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344198›Full record

Trial reportHealth promotion practice2022

Process Evaluation of a Mailed Interactive Educational DVD in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Mira L Katz, Brent Emerson, Victoria L Champion, Peter H Schwartz, Thomas F Imperiale, Hala Fatima, Electra D Paskett, Susan M Perkins, Yan Tong, Netsanet Gebregziabher and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health promotion practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Video brochures in a mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach program provide cancer screening information in a user-friendly format for rural Appalachian community members.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Development and Feasibility Testing of a Multilevel Intervention to Increase Hepatitis C Virus Screening Among Baby Boomers in Primary Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mira L KatzThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9791-7592
Brent EmersonThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9343-4822
Victoria L ChampionIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Peter H SchwartzIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Thomas F ImperialeIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Hala FatimaIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Electra D PaskettThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Susan M PerkinsIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Yan TongIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Netsanet GebregziabherIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Connie KrierIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kevin TharpIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Caeli MalloyIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sylvia StromCommunity Advisory Board Member, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan M RawlIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Advanced Training in Self-Management Interventions for Serious Chronic ConditionsT32NR018407 · NINR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KNOPF, AMELIA S, MILLER, WENDY RENEE · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR018407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A process evaluation was conducted as part of a comparative effectiveness trial of a mailed interactive educational DVD intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among average-risk patients who did not attend a scheduled colonoscopy. Participants (n = 371) for the trial were randomized to (1) mailed DVD, (2) mailed DVD plus patient navigation, or (3) usual care. Participants (n = 243) randomized to the two DVD intervention arms were called 2 weeks after mailing materials to complete a process evaluation interview about the DVD (September 2017-February 2020). Forty-nine (20%) participants were not reached, and 194 (80%) participants watched the DVD and completed the interview. The process evaluation assessed whether (1) the DVD content was helpful, (2) any new information was learned by participants, (3) the appropriate amount of information was included in the DVD, (4) participants were engaged when watching the DVD, (5) the DVD content was relevant, (6) participants were satisfied with the DVD (7) participants would recommend the DVD to others, and (8) their opinion about colorectal cancer screening was changed by watching the DVD. Among participants who watched the DVD, 99% reported the screening information was very or somewhat helpful, 47% learned new information, 75% said the DVD included the right amount of information, they were engaged (M = 3.35 out of 4, SD = 0.49), 87% reported all or most information applied to them, they were satisfied (M = 3.42 out of 4, SD = 0.39) with DVD content, 99% would recommend the DVD to others, and 45% reported changing their opinion about screening. To understand the effects of interventions being tested in trials and to plan the dissemination of evidence-based interventions, process evaluation is critical to assess the dose received and acceptability of behavioral interventions.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPatient NavigationColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningOccult Bloodcolonoscopycolorectal cancercolorectal cancer screeningDVD interventionfecal immunochemical testprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34344198
PMCPMC9373859
OpenAlexW3191985585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.