Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34344177›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Adaptive shifts underlie the divergence in wing morphology in bombycoid moths.

Brett R Aiello, Milton Tan, Usama Bin Sikandar, Alexis J Alvey, Burhanuddin Bhinderwala, Katalina C Kimball, Jesse R Barber, Chris A Hamilton, Akito Y Kawahara, Simon Sponberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Brett R AielloSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Milton TanIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Usama Bin SikandarSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Alexis J AlveyIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Burhanuddin BhinderwalaSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Katalina C KimballSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Jesse R BarberDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Chris A HamiltonDepartment of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Akito Y KawaharaFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Simon SponbergSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USBoise State University · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of flapping flight is linked to the prolific success of insects. Across Insecta, wing morphology diversified, strongly impacting aerodynamic performance. In the presence of ecological opportunity, discrete adaptive shifts and early bursts are two processes hypothesized to give rise to exceptional morphological diversification. Here, we use the sister-families Sphingidae and Saturniidae to answer how the evolution of aerodynamically important traits is linked to clade divergence and through what process(es) these traits evolve. Many agile Sphingidae evolved hover feeding behaviours, while adult Saturniidae lack functional mouth parts and rely on a fixed energy budget as adults. We find that Sphingidae underwent an adaptive shift in wing morphology coincident with life history and behaviour divergence, evolving small high aspect ratio wings advantageous for power reduction that can be moved at high frequencies, beneficial for flight control. By contrast, Saturniidae, which do not feed as adults, evolved large wings and morphology which surprisingly does not reduce aerodynamic power, but could contribute to their erratic flight behaviour, aiding in predator avoidance. We suggest that after the evolution of flapping flight, diversification of wing morphology can be potentiated by adaptative shifts, shaping the diversity of wing morphology across insects.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFlight, AnimalHumansInsectaModels, BiologicalWings, Animalevolutionflightmothwing shape

Identifiers

PMID34344177
PMCPMC8334871
OpenAlexW3190701387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.