Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34343337›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Human-Mediated Admixture and Selection Shape the Diversity on the Modern Swine (Sus scrofa) Y Chromosomes.

Huashui Ai, Mingpeng Zhang, Bin Yang, Amy Goldberg, Wanbo Li, Junwu Ma, Debora Brandt, Zhiyan Zhang, Rasmus Nielsen, Lusheng Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ancient DNA reveals pig domestication history in Northeastern China.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inferences about the population history ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Huashui AiNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Mingpeng ZhangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Bin YangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Amy GoldbergDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Wanbo LiNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Junwu MaNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Debora BrandtDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Zhiyan ZhangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Rasmus NielsenDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-6591
Lusheng HuangNational Key Laboratory for Swine Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China.
Jiangxi Agricultural University · CNUniversity of California, Berkeley · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout its distribution across Eurasia, domestic pig (Sus scrofa) populations have acquired differences through natural and artificial selection, and have often interbred. We resequenced 80 Eurasian pigs from nine different Asian and European breeds; we identify 42,288 reliable SNPs on the Y chromosome in a panel of 103 males, among which 96.1% are newly detected. Based on these new data, we elucidate the evolutionary history of pigs through the lens of the Y chromosome. We identify two highly divergent haplogroups: one present only in Asia and one fixed in Europe but present in some Asian populations. Analyzing the European haplotypes present in Asian populations, we find evidence of three independent waves of introgression from Europe to Asia in last 200 years, agreeing well with the literature and historical records. The diverse European lineages were brought in China by humans and left significant imprints not only on the autosomes but also on the Y chromosome of geographically and genetically distinct Chinese pig breeds. We also find a general excess of European ancestry on Y chromosomes relative to autosomes in Chinese pigs, an observation that cannot be explained solely by sex-biased migration and genetic drift. The European Y haplotype is associated with leaner meat production, and we hypothesize that the European Y chromosome increased in frequency in Chinese populations due to artificial selection. We find evidence of Y chromosomal gene flow between Sumatran wild boar and Chinese pigs. Our results demonstrate how human-mediated admixture and selection shaped the distribution of modern swine Y chromosomes.

Indexed as

BreedingY ChromosomeAnimalsBiological EvolutionHaplotypesHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSus scrofaSwineadmixturegenome sequencingpigselectionY chromosome

Identifiers

PMID34343337
PMCPMC8557463
OpenAlexW3189002218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.