Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34343293›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

DrosoPhyla: Resources for Drosophilid Phylogeny and Systematics.

Cédric Finet, Victoria A Kassner, Antonio B Carvalho, Henry Chung, Jonathan P Day, Stephanie Day, Emily K Delaney, Francine C De Ré, Héloïse D Dufour, Eduardo Dupim and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lifestyles ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic analyses inEvolution letters · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent horizontal transfer of transposable elements inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Is variation in female aggressiveness acrossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Cédric FinetHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
Victoria A KassnerHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
Antonio B CarvalhoDepartamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Henry ChungDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5056-2755
Jonathan P DayDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stephanie DayDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Emily K DelaneyDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, USA.
Francine C De RéPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Héloïse D DufourHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
Eduardo DupimDepartamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hiroyuki F IzumitaniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Thaísa B GautérioPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jessa JustenHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
Toru KatohDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, USA.
Shigeyuki KoshikawaThe Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan.
Ben LongdonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Elgion L LoretoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Maria D S NunesDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom.
Komal K B RajaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, USA.
Mark RebeizDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Michael G RitchieSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Gayane SaakyanDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, USA.
Tanya SneddonSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Machiko TeramotoThe Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan.
Venera TyukmaevaSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1864-5101
Thyago VanderlindeDepartamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5764-9703
Emily E WeyDepartment of Biology, University of Dayton, USA.
Thomas WernerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8865-365X
Thomas M WilliamsDepartment of Biology, University of Dayton, USA.
Lizandra J RobePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Masanori J TodaHokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ferdinand MarlétazCentre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Evolutionary InnovationsR35GM122592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARTYOM KOPP · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster is a pivotal model for invertebrate development, genetics, physiology, neuroscience, and disease. The whole family Drosophilidae, which contains over 4,400 species, offers a plethora of cases for comparative and evolutionary studies. Despite a long history of phylogenetic inference, many relationships remain unresolved among the genera, subgenera, and species groups in the Drosophilidae. To clarify these relationships, we first developed a set of new genomic markers and assembled a multilocus data set of 17 genes from 704 species of Drosophilidae. We then inferred a species tree with highly supported groups for this family. Additionally, we were able to determine the phylogenetic position of some previously unplaced species. These results establish a new framework for investigating the evolution of traits in fruit flies, as well as valuable resources for systematics.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsPhylogenyDrosophilidaephylogenomicssystematics

Identifiers

PMID34343293
PMCPMC8382681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.