Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34343245›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Network-guided identification of cancer-selective combinatorial therapies in ovarian cancer.

Liye He, Daria Bulanova, Jaana Oikkonen, Antti Häkkinen, Kaiyang Zhang, Shuyu Zheng, Wenyu Wang, Erdogan Pekcan Erkan, Olli Carpén, Titta Joutsiniemi and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Systematic review of computational methods for drug combination prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Liye HeInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6632-2112
Daria BulanovaBiotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC) at the University of Copenhagen (UC), Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana OikkonenONCOSYS Research Program in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti HäkkinenUniversity of Helsinki (UH), Helsinki, Finland.
Kaiyang ZhangONCOSYS Research Program in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Shuyu ZhengONCOSYS Research Program in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Wenyu WangONCOSYS Research Program in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Erdogan Pekcan ErkanONCOSYS Research Program in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli CarpénONCOSYS Research Program in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Titta JoutsiniemiGynecologic oncology in Turku University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sakari HietanenONCOSYS Research Program in UH and in University of Turku (UTU), Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna HynninenONCOSYS Research Programme in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Kaisa HuhtinenONCOSYS Research Programme in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Sampsa HautaniemiONCOSYS Research Programme in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna VähärautioONCOSYS Research Programme in UH, Helsinki, Finland.
Jing TangONCOSYS Research Programme in UH, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7480-7710
Krister WennerbergBiotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), Helsinki, Finland.
Tero AittokallioFIMM and OCBE/OUH, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-9769
Oncos Therapeutics (Finland) · FIBiocenter Finland · FIInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each patient's cancer consists of multiple cell subpopulations that are inherently heterogeneous and may develop differing phenotypes such as drug sensitivity or resistance. A personalized treatment regimen should therefore target multiple oncoproteins in the cancer cell populations that are driving the treatment resistance or disease progression in a given patient to provide maximal therapeutic effect, while avoiding severe co-inhibition of non-malignant cells that would lead to toxic side effects. To address the intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity when designing combinatorial treatment regimens for cancer patients, we have implemented a machine learning-based platform to guide identification of safe and effective combinatorial treatments that selectively inhibit cancer-related dysfunctions or resistance mechanisms in individual patients. In this case study, we show how the platform enables prediction of cancer-selective drug combinations for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer using single-cell imaging cytometry drug response assay, combined with genome-wide transcriptomic and genetic profiles. The platform makes use of drug-target interaction networks to prioritize those combinations that warrant further preclinical testing in scarce patient-derived primary cells. During the case study in ovarian cancer patients, we investigated (i) the relative performance of various ensemble learning algorithms for drug response prediction, (ii) the use of matched single-cell RNA-sequencing data to deconvolute cell population-specific transcriptome profiles from bulk RNA-seq data, (iii) and whether multi-patient or patient-specific predictive models lead to better predictive accuracy. The general platform and the comparison results are expected to become useful for future studies that use similar predictive approaches also in other cancer types.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsTumor Cells, Culturedcombination synergydrug combinationsmachine learningnetwork visualizationovarian cancerprecision oncologytoxic effects

Identifiers

PMID34343245
PMCPMC8574973
OpenAlexW3192627285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.