Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34343202›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

University students' perspectives, planned uptake, and hesitancy regarding the COVID-19 vaccine: A multi-methods study.

Madeleine Mant, Asal Aslemand, Andrew Prine, Alyson Jaagumägi Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A comparative systematic scan of COVID-19 health literacy information sources for Canadian university students.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parents' Trust in COVID-19 Messengers and Implications for Vaccination.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeleine MantDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-9959
Asal AslemandDepartment of Mathematical & Computational Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew PrineGroves Memorial Community Hospital, Fergus, Ontario, Canada.
Alyson Jaagumägi HollandDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate university students' willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available to them.

methodA multi-methods approach was used-online convenience sample surveys and semi-structured interviews-of young adults attending a large Canadian public university. Two survey samples were collected (June 20-July 28, 2020 and September 22-October 17, 2020). Semi-structured interviews were conducted following each survey, interviewing 20 students in each round.

resultsIn June 77.8% of surveyed students (n = 483) were willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine; in September 79.6% were willing (n = 1269). Multinomial and binary logistic regression analyses found that increasing perception of the severity of COVID-19 predicted the likelihood that a respondent was willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine in both surveys. In the latter survey students who indicated they would be encouraged to get the COVID-19 vaccine if their doctor/pharmacist recommended it were 76 times more likely to be willing to get the vaccine than those who would not be encouraged by medical advice. Interviews revealed concerns about the speed of the vaccine roll out, safety, and efficacy.

conclusionsThe majority of university students intend to get the COVID-19 vaccine, but there are nuanced concerns about efficacy and safety that must be taken into account by public health authorities as the vaccine becomes available to this group. Ensuring that family doctors, pharmacists, and other front-line healthcare workers have consistent and clear information regarding the benefits of vaccination will be critical to encouraging uptake among young adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttitudeCanadaCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMaleSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34343202
PMCPMC8330905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.