Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342916›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

A longitudinal analysis of smoke-free laws and smoking initiation disparities among young adults in the United States.

Andrea R Titus, Yanmei Xie, James F Thrasher, David T Levy, Michael R Elliott, Megan E Patrick, Nancy L Fleischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea R TitusPopulation Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7586-643X
Yanmei XieEpidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James F ThrasherHealth Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
David T LevyOncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-3612
Michael R ElliottBiostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Megan E PatrickInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3594-4944
Nancy L FleischerEpidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Monitoring the Future: A Cohort-Sequential Panel Study of Drug Use, Ages 19-65 - Diversity Supplement (Solberg)R01DA016575 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Megan E. Patrick · 2003 to 2026
$44.6M
The Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Health Equity in the United States - MERIT ExtensionR37CA214787 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLEISCHER, NANCY · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214787NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTobacco control policies may differentially impact smoking initiation among socio-demographic groups. We measured longitudinal associations between exposure to smoke-free laws in grade 12 (modal age 18 years) and patterns of smoking initiation in the United States.

designProspective longitudinal analysis. SETTING AND

participantsWe used data on US young adults sampled at modal age 18 years from the Monitoring the Future Survey. Baseline data were collected between 2000 and 2017, with the last year of follow-up in 2018. The sample number varied by outcome and time-point, ranging from 7314 to 17 702. MEASUREMENTS: Smoke-free law coverage in work-places and hospitality venues (restaurants/bars) was measured as the percentage of the county population covered by each type of law. We examined associations with any past 30-day smoking initiation and daily smoking initiation at modal ages 19/20, 21/22 and 23/24, using Poisson regression and calculating average marginal effects. We explored effect modification by sex, race/ethnicity and parental education by testing the significance of interaction terms.

findingsWork-place law coverage at modal age 18 was associated with a lower probability of daily smoking initiation at modal ages 21/22 [-2.4 percentage points (p.p.); 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.9, -0.9] and 23/24 (-2.0 p.p.; 95% CI = -3.9, -0.2). Hospitality law coverage was associated with a lower probability of daily smoking initiation at modal ages 19/20 (-1.6 p.p.; 95% CI = -2.8, -0.4), 21/22 (-2.3 p.p.; 95% CI = -3.7, -0.9) and 23/24 (-1.8 p.p.; 95% CI = -3.6, -0.0). Findings were inconclusive with regard to associations with any past 30-day smoking initiation and with regard to effect modification, after adjusting for multiple testing.

conclusionsExposure to smoke-free laws at age 18 appears to be prospectively associated with reduced daily smoking initiation 1-6 years later.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionAdolescentAdultHumansProspective StudiesRestaurantsSmokingUnited StatesYoung AdultTobacco Smoke PollutionHealth disparitieshealth equitypublic policysmoke-free lawsmoking initiationtobacco

Identifiers

PMID34342916
PMCPMC8810897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.