Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342887›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2021

Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

Edward J Golob, Jeremy T Nelson, Jaelle Scheuerman, Kristen B Venable, Jeffrey R Mock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Front-back asymmetries in endogenous auditory spatial attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edward J GolobDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jeremy T NelsonMilitary Health Institute, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jaelle ScheuermanDepartment of Computer Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Kristen B VenableDepartment of Computer Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jeffrey R MockDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0446-6687

Funding

Shifting auditory spatial attention: cognitive and neural mechanismsR01DC014736 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI GOLOB, EDWARD J · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection and effort are central to attention, yet it is unclear whether they draw on a common pool of cognitive resources, and if so, whether there are differences for early versus later stages of cognitive processing. This study assessed effort by quantifying the vigilance decrement, and spatial processing at early and later stages as a function of time-on-task. Participants performed an auditory spatial attention task, with occasional "catch" trials requiring no response. Psychophysiological measures included bilateral cerebral blood flow (transcranial Doppler), pupil dilation, and blink rate. The shape of attention gradients using reaction time indexed early processing, and did not significantly vary over time. Later stimulus-response conflict was comparable over time, except for a reduction to left hemispace stimuli. Target and catch trial accuracy decreased with time, with a more abrupt decrease for catch versus target trials. Diffusion decision modeling found progressive decreases in information accumulation rate and non-decision time, and the adoption of more liberal response criteria. Cerebral blood flow increased from baseline and then decreased over time, particularly in the left hemisphere. Blink rate steadily increased over time, while pupil dilation increased only at the beginning and then returned towards baseline. The findings suggest dissociations between resources for selectivity and effort. Measures of high subjective effort and temporal declines in catch trial accuracy and cerebral blood flow velocity suggest a standard vigilance decrement was evident in parallel with preserved selection. Different attentional systems and classes of computations that may account for dissociations between selectivity versus effort are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultArousalAttentionAuditory PerceptionCerebrovascular CirculationExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialYoung Adultattention captureDDMdiffusion decision modeleye trackingSimon effectsustained attentiontranscranial Dopplervigilance decrement

Identifiers

PMID34342887
PMCPMC8419090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.