ArticleNeurocritical care2022
Prediction of Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest Using Neurofilament Light Chain is Improved by a Proteomics-Based Multimarker Panel.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Serum neurofilament light chain as a predictive marker of neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Serum S100B Protein for Neurological Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predictive Performance of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) for Survival after Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Sustained Increase in Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein after First ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous advances in resuscitation care have increased survival, but the rate of favorable neurological outcome remains low. We have shown the usefulness of proteomics in identifying novel biomarkers to predict neurological outcome. Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a marker of axonal damage, has since emerged as a promising single marker. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of NfL in comparison with and in addition to our established model.
methodsNfL was measured in plasma samples drawn at 48 h after cardiac arrest using single-molecule assays. Neurological function was recorded on the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale at discharge from the intensive care unit and after 6 months. The ability to predict a dichotomized outcome (CPC 1-2 vs. 3-5) was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsSeventy patients were included in this analysis, of whom 21 (30%) showed a favorable outcome (CPC 1-2), compared with 49 (70%) with an unfavorable outcome (CPC 3-5) at discharge. NfL increased from CPC 1 to 5 (16.5 pg/ml to 641 pg/ml, p < 0.001). The addition of NfL to the existing model improved it significantly (Wald test, p < 0.001), and the combination of NfL with a multimarker model showed high areas under the ROC curve (89.7% [95% confidence interval 81.7-97.7] at discharge and 93.7% [88.2-99.2] at 6 months) that were significantly greater than each model alone.
conclusionsThe combination of NfL with other plasma and clinical markers is superior to that of either model alone and achieves high areas under the ROC curve in this relatively small sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34342833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.