Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342833›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2022

Prediction of Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest Using Neurofilament Light Chain is Improved by a Proteomics-Based Multimarker Panel.

Raphael Wurm, Henrike Arfsten, Besnik Muqaku, Markus Ponleitner, Andrea Bileck, Patrick Altmann, Paulus Rommer, Stefan Seidel, Pia Hubner, Fritz Sterz and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Raphael WurmDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Henrike ArfstenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Besnik MuqakuDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus PonleitnerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea BileckDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Patrick AltmannDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Paulus RommerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan SeidelDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pia HubnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fritz SterzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gottfried HeinzDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christopher GernerDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christopher AdlbrechtImed19-privat, Private Clinical Research Center, Vienna, Austria. c.adlbrecht@imed19.at.
Klaus DistelmaierDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous advances in resuscitation care have increased survival, but the rate of favorable neurological outcome remains low. We have shown the usefulness of proteomics in identifying novel biomarkers to predict neurological outcome. Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a marker of axonal damage, has since emerged as a promising single marker. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of NfL in comparison with and in addition to our established model.

methodsNfL was measured in plasma samples drawn at 48 h after cardiac arrest using single-molecule assays. Neurological function was recorded on the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale at discharge from the intensive care unit and after 6 months. The ability to predict a dichotomized outcome (CPC 1-2 vs. 3-5) was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsSeventy patients were included in this analysis, of whom 21 (30%) showed a favorable outcome (CPC 1-2), compared with 49 (70%) with an unfavorable outcome (CPC 3-5) at discharge. NfL increased from CPC 1 to 5 (16.5 pg/ml to 641 pg/ml, p < 0.001). The addition of NfL to the existing model improved it significantly (Wald test, p < 0.001), and the combination of NfL with a multimarker model showed high areas under the ROC curve (89.7% [95% confidence interval 81.7-97.7] at discharge and 93.7% [88.2-99.2] at 6 months) that were significantly greater than each model alone.

conclusionsThe combination of NfL with other plasma and clinical markers is superior to that of either model alone and achieves high areas under the ROC curve in this relatively small sample.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestIntermediate FilamentsBiomarkersHumansPrognosisProteomicsROC CurveBiomarkersCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationNeurofilament light chainPrognosticationProteomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.