Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342799›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma.

Takafumi Yagisawa, Toshio Takagi, Kazuhiko Yoshida, Keisuke Hata, Junpei Iizuka, Yasuto Muromiya, Tsunenori Kondo, Kazunari Tanabe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Functional and oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takafumi YagisawaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Toshio TakagiDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. t.takagi1192@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1775-0943
Kazuhiko YoshidaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Keisuke HataDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Junpei IizukaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Yasuto MuromiyaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Tsunenori KondoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunari TanabeDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
Tokyo Women's Medical University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between patients with cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) and those with solid RCC (sRCC). We retrospectively analyzed 1065 patients who underwent RAPN between 2013 and 2020 for a pathological diagnosis of RCC. Patients were divided into two groups: cRCC and sRCC. cRCC was diagnosed according to the Bosniak classification system. To minimize selection bias between the two groups, patient variables (patient characteristics) and tumor factors (such as size and complexity) were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching. Of the 1065 patients, 94 (9%) were diagnosed with cRCC. Bosniak categories of IIF, III, and IV were noted in 4 (4.2%), 31 (33%), and 59 (63%) patients, respectively. After matching, 83 patients each were assigned to the cRCC and sRCC groups. The operation time in cRCC tended to be longer than in sRCC but not significantly different (164 vs. 150 min, P = 0.0767). Other surgical outcomes, such as change in estimated glomerular filtration rate ( - 5.2 vs.  - 7.2%, P = 0.1577), perioperative complications (14.5 vs. 15.7%, P = 0.9225), estimated blood loss (62 vs. 58 mL, P = 0.5613), or negative surgical margin status (100 vs 99%, P = 0.236), were not significantly different between the two groups. During the follow-up period of about 2 years, one and two patients showed recurrence in the cRCC and sRCC groups, respectively. The surgical outcomes of RAPN were similar between cRCC and sRCC, demonstrating the feasibility of RAPN for cRCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCysticNephrectomyRenal neoplasmRobotics

Identifiers

PMID34342799
OpenAlexW3192337519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.