Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342784›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Thrombotic superior vena cava syndrome: a national emergency department database study.

Tanveer Mir, Mohammed Uddin, Obeid Shafi, Waqas Qureshi, Jasmeet Kaur, Mohamed Zghouzi, Prateek Lohia, Ayman Soubani, Mark Burket, Mujeeb Sheikh and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Large-bore catheter selection in endovascular management of superior vena cava syndrome.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tanveer MirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201, St Antoine St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. gr6723@wayne.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6822-9600
Mohammed UddinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201, St Antoine St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Obeid ShafiClinical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Waqas QureshiDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jasmeet KaurDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, MI, USA.
Mohamed ZghouziDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201, St Antoine St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Prateek LohiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201, St Antoine St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Ayman SoubaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201, St Antoine St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Mark BurketDivision of Cardiology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Mujeeb SheikhDivision of Cardiology, Promedica, Toledo, OH, USA.
Ghulam SaydainDepartment of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201, St Antoine St., Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Wayne State University · USTrinity Health Oakland Hospital · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature regarding etiology and trends of incidence of major thoracic vein thrombosis in the United States is limited. To study the causes, complications, in-hospital mortality rate, and trend in the incidence of major thoracic vein thrombosis which could have led to superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) between 2010 and 2018. Data from the nationwide emergency department sample (NEDS) that constitutes 20% sample of hospital-owned emergency departments (ED) and in-patient sample in the United States were analyzed using diagnostic codes. A linear p-trend was used to assess the trends. Of the total 1082 million ED visits, 37,807 (3.5/100,000) (mean age 53.81 ± 18.07 years, 55% females) patients were recorded with major thoracic vein thrombosis in the ED encounters. Among these patients, 4070 (10.6%) patients had one or more cancers associated with thrombosis. Pacemaker/defibrillator-related thrombosis was recorded in 2820 (7.5%) patients, while intravascular catheter-induced thrombosis was recorded in 1755 (4.55%) patients. Half of the patients had associated complication of pulmonary embolism. A total of 59 (0.15%) patients died during these hospital encounters. The yearly trend for the thrombosis for every 100,000 ED encounters in the United States increased from 2.17/100,000 in 2010 to 5.98/100,000 in 2018 (liner p-trend < 0.001). Yearly trend for catheter/lead associated thrombosis was also up-trending (p-trend 0.015). SVCS is an uncommon medical emergency related to malignancy and indwelling venous devices. The increasing trend in SVCS incidence, predominantly catheter/lead induced, and the high rate of associated pulmonary embolism should prompt physicians to remain vigilant for appropriate evaluation.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismSuperior Vena Cava SyndromeThrombosisAdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesIndwelling vascular devicesMalignancyPacemaker/defibrillator leadsPulmonary embolismSuperior vena cava syndromeThoracic vein thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID34342784
OpenAlexW3192762879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.