Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342768›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Accuracy of saliva and nasopharyngeal sampling for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in community screening: a multicentric cohort study.

Solen Kernéis, Caroline Elie, Jacques Fourgeaud, Laure Choupeaux, Séverine Mercier Delarue, Marie-Laure Alby, Pierre Quentin, Juliette Pavie, Patricia Brazille, Marie Laure Néré and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04578509 (Evaluation of a Screening Program for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the General Population Based on the Use of New Detection Approaches or for Diagnostic Orientation on Saliva), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04578509 completednot on this map

Evaluation of a Screening Program for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the General Population Based on the Use of New Detection Approaches or for Diagnostic Orientation on Saliva (COVID-19)

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2021Enrolled5,197ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19ArmsNasopharyngeal swab, Saliva sample, axillary sweat sample, Data collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Solen KernéisUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75018, Paris, France. solen.kerneis@aphp.fr.
Caroline ElieClinical Research Unit / Clinical Investigation Center, APHP, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, 75015, Paris, France.
Jacques FourgeaudVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 75015, Paris, France.
Laure ChoupeauxClinical Research Unit / Clinical Investigation Center, APHP, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, 75015, Paris, France.
Séverine Mercier DelarueVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.
Marie-Laure AlbyCentre de Dépistage COVISAN 13 14 15, Communauté Professionnelle de Territoire de Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
Pierre QuentinCentre de Dépistage COVISAN 13 14 15, Communauté Professionnelle de Territoire de Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
Juliette PavieImmuno-Infectiologie, AP-HP, Hôtel Dieu, 75004, Paris, France.
Patricia BrazilleCentre de Dépistage COVISAN, AP-HP, Hôtel Dieu, 75004, Paris, France.
Marie Laure NéréVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.
Marine MinierVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.
Audrey GabassiVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.
Aurélien GibaudVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.
Sébastien GauthierCentre de Ressources Biologiques - Site Cochin, AP-HP, Fédération des CRB/PRB D'AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75014, Paris, France.
Chrystel LeroyPlateforme SeqOIA, AP-HP, 75014, Paris, France.
Etienne Voirin-MathieuPlateforme SeqOIA, AP-HP, 75014, Paris, France.
Claire PoyartUniversité de Paris, INSERM, Institut Cochin, 1016, F-75014, Paris, France.
Michel VidaudPlateforme SeqOIA, AP-HP, 75014, Paris, France.
Béatrice ParfaitCentre de Ressources Biologiques - Site Cochin, AP-HP, Fédération des CRB/PRB D'AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 75014, Paris, France.
Constance DelaugerreVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.
Jean-Marc TréluyerClinical Research Unit / Clinical Investigation Center, APHP, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, 75015, Paris, France.
Jérôme LeGoffVirologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal sampling for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is the standard diagnostic test of coronavirus disease 2019. Our objectives were to assess, in real-life conditions, the diagnostic accuracy of a nasopharyngeal point-of-care antigen (Ag) test and of saliva NAAT for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in ambulatory care. This was a prospective cohort study from 19 October through 18 December 2020 in two community COVID-19 screening centers in Paris, France. Two nasopharyngeal swabs and one saliva sample were simultaneously collected. Diagnostic accuracies of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of three saliva NAAT methods were assessed as compared to nasopharyngeal NAAT. A total of 1452 ambulatory children and adults were included. Overall, 129/1443 (9%) participants tested positive on nasopharyngeal NAAT (102/564 [18%] in symptomatic and 27/879 [3%] in asymptomatic participants). Sensitivity was 94%, 23%, 96%, and 94% for the three different protocols of saliva NAAT and for the nasopharyngeal Ag test, respectively. Estimates of specificity were above 95% for all methods. Diagnostic accuracy was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of saliva NAAT is similar to that of nasopharyngeal NAAT, subject to compliance with specific protocols for saliva. Registration number: NCT04578509.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNasopharynxNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesParisPoint-of-Care TestingProspective StudiesSalivaSARS-CoV-2Antigen testDiagnostic performancesNucleic acid amplification testingSalivaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34342768
PMCPMC8329409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.