Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342736›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021

Influence of stress on physiological synchrony in a stressful versus non-stressful group setting.

Bernadette Denk, Stephanie J Dimitroff, Maria Meier, Annika B E Benz, Ulrike U Bentele, Eva Unternaehrer, Nathalie F Popovic, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Jens C Pruessner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent developments in stress and anxiety research.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bernadette DenkUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany. bernadette.denk@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-8815
Stephanie J DimitroffUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Maria MeierUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Annika B E BenzUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Ulrike U BenteleUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Eva UnternaehrerUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Nathalie F PopovicUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Wolfgang GaissmaierUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Jens C PruessnerUniversity of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2117 - 422037984Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR 2374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological synchrony (PS) is defined as the co-occurrence and interdependence of physiological activity between interaction partners. Previous research has uncovered numerous influences on the extent of PS, such as relationship type or individual characteristics. Here, we investigate the influence of acute stress on PS. We do so in a setting in which PS was not promoted, but contact between group members was explicitly minimized. We reanalyzed cortisol, alpha-amylase, and subjective stress data from 138 participants (mean age = [Formula: see text], 47.1% female) who previously underwent the Trier Social Stress Test for groups (TSST-G) or a non-stressful control task together, collected as part of a larger project by Popovic et al. (Sci Rep 10: 7845, 2020). Using a stability and influence model, an established method to test for synchrony, we tested whether individuals' cortisol and alpha-amylase concentrations could be predicted by group members' levels. We found cortisol PS in participants who were in the same group, the extent of which was stronger in the non-stressful control condition. For alpha-amylase, participants were synchronized as well; furthermore, there was an interaction between previous stress levels and PS. This suggests that while synchrony of both stress markers can occur in group settings even with spurious interaction, stressor exposure might attenuate its extent. We argue that if PS occurs in a sample where interaction was minimal, the phenomenon might be more widespread than previously thought. Furthermore, stressor exposure might influence whether a situation allows for PS. We conclude that PS should be investigated within group settings with various degrees of social interaction to further expose mechanisms of and influence on PS.

Indexed as

SalivaStress, PsychologicalFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMalePsychological TestsHydrocortisoneAlpha-amylaseCortisolEndocrine synchronyPhysiological synchronyStress contagionTrier Social Stress Test for groups

Identifiers

PMID34342736
PMCPMC8423710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.