ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Cognitive control in the research domain criteria system: clinical implications for auditory verbal hallucinations].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Transdiagnostic Connectome Project: an open dataset for studying brain-behavior relationships in psychiatry.Scientific data · 2025Article
- The Transdiagnostic Connectome Project: a richly phenotyped open dataset for advancing the study of brain-behavior relationships in psychiatry.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive control (CC) represents one of six constructs within the research domain criteria (RDoC) domain of cognitive systems, which can be examined using different units of analyses (from genetic and molecular mechanisms to neural circuits and self-reports). The CC is defined as the ability to execute top-down control over task-specific processes and to coordinate thought and actions to achieve a specific goal. Within the field of cognitive neuroscience, recent studies provided important findings about central neuronal components of the CC network and the interactions with other relevant functional systems. In the development and maintenance of distinct psychiatrically relevant symptoms, such as auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) or hearing voices, dysfunctional CC is thought to play an essential transdiagnostic role. This selective literature review addresses the specific and clinically relevant question of the extent to which the RDoC construct of CC has been incorporated into studies investigating the neurobiological mechanisms of AVH. In addition, an overview of the extent to which findings exploring the underlying mechanisms have been transferred into daily clinical routine is provided. Furthermore, future research perspectives and therapeutic approaches are discussed. Based on currently preferred neurobiological models of AVH, nonpharmacological strategies, such as brain stimulation techniques and psychotherapy can be derived. Further research perspectives arise in the field of interventional studies oriented towards the RDoC matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.