ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Twelve years of research domain criteria in psychiatric research and practice: claim and reality].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neuro-computational social learning framework to facilitate transdiagnostic classification and treatment across psychiatric disorders.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Addictive and other mental disorders: a call for a standardized definition of dual disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research domain criteria (RDoC) initiative of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) was presented 12 years ago. The RDoC provides a matrix for the systematic, dimensional and domain-based study of mental disorders that is not based on established disease entities as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The primary aim of RDoC is to understand the nature of mental health and illness in terms of different extents of dysfunction in psychological/biological systems with interconnected diagnoses. This selective review article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RDoC-based studies that have contributed to a better conceptual organization of mental disorders. Numerous promising and methodologically sophisticated studies on RDoC were identified. The number of scientific studies increased over time, indicating that dimensional research is increasingly being pursued in psychiatry. In summary, the RDoC initiative has a considerable potential to more precisely define the complexity of pathomechanisms underlying mental disorders; however, major challenges (e.g. small and heterogeneous study samples, unclear biomarker definitions and lack of replication studies) remain to be overcome in the future. Furthermore, it is plausible that a diagnostic system of the future will integrate categorical and dimensional approaches to arrive at a stratification that can underpin a precision medical approach in psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34342676What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.