Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342646›Full record

ReviewJournal of vision2021

Translucency perception: A review.

Davit Gigilashvili, Jean-Baptiste Thomas, Jon Yngve Hardeberg, Marius Pedersen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital Tools for Translucence Evaluation of Prosthodontic Materials: Application of Kubelka-Munk Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Davit GigilashviliNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Gjøvik, Norway.
Jean-Baptiste ThomasNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Gjøvik, Norway.
Jon Yngve HardebergNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Gjøvik, Norway.
Marius PedersenNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Gjøvik, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NONTNU Samfunnsforskning · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translucency is an optical and a perceptual phenomenon that characterizes subsurface light transport through objects and materials. Translucency as an optical property of a material relates to the radiative transfer inside and through this medium, and translucency as a perceptual phenomenon describes the visual sensation experienced by humans when observing a given material under given conditions. The knowledge about the visual mechanisms of the translucency perception remains limited. Accurate prediction of the appearance of the translucent objects can have a significant commercial impact in the fields such as three-dimensional printing. However, little is known how the optical properties of a material relate to a perception evoked in humans. This article overviews the knowledge status about the visual perception of translucency and highlights the applications of the translucency perception research. Furthermore, this review summarizes current knowledge gaps, fundamental challenges and existing ambiguities with a goal to facilitate translucency perception research in the future.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionHumansSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID34342646
PMCPMC8340651
OpenAlexW3191257171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.