ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Distribution and Classification of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Healthy Young Adults.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term structural impact and antiviral efficacy of cytomegalovirus anterior uveitis - results from a 10-year ocular inflammation registry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Thinning of central foveal thickness in the retina of patients with schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Interocular symmetry and asymmetry in ocular health and disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Guidelines for glaucoma imaging classification, annotation, and quality control for artificial intelligence applications.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Normative Profile of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Lamina Cribrosa-Related Parameters in a Healthy Non-Glaucoma Cynomolgus Monkey Colony.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Parameters and Their Associated Factors in Cynomolgus Macaques.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Corneal biomechanics and their association with severity of lens dislocation in Marfan syndrome.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Characteristics of the optic disc in young people with high myopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- The Relationship Between Fetal Growth and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in a Cohort of Young Adults.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Nomogram of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in myopic eyes of north Indian population.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Young Adults: Review of Findings From the Raine Study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report the distribution of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in healthy young adults, investigate factors associated with RNFL thickness, and report the percentage of outside normal limits (ONL) and borderline (BL) RNFL thickness classifications based on the optical coherence tomography (OCT) manufacturer reference database. Methods: Participants of the Raine Study Generation 2 cohort (aged 18-22 years) underwent spectral domain OCT imaging with an RNFL circle scan. Eyes with inadequate scans or optic nerve pathology were excluded. Linear mixed models were used to analyze associations. Results: Data were available for 1288 participants (mean age, 20.0 years). Mean RNFL thicknesses in right and left eyes, respectively, were global = 100.5 µm, 100.3 µm (P = 0.03); temporal = 73.1 µm, 68.9 µm (P < 0.001); superotemporal = 140.6 µm, 136.3 µm (P < 0.001); superonasal = 104.9 µm, 115.1 µm (P < 0.001); nasal = 79.7 µm, 79.1 µm (P = 0.09); inferonasal = 109.8 µm, 111.5 µm (P < 0.001); and inferotemporal = 143.2 µm, 143.6 µm (P = 0.51). Longer axial length was associated with thinner RNFL globally, nasally, inferotemporally, superotemporally, superonasally, and inferonasally, as well as thicker RNFL temporally. The prevalence of ONL and BL classifications was generally higher than the expected rates of 1% and 4%, respectively, in temporal sectors and lower than expected in nasal sectors. The prevalence of global BL classifications was lower than expected (right eye, 2.3%; left eye, 2.6%). Conclusions: Measured RNFL thickness differs with axial length and between right and left eyes. More reference data are needed to better define the normal limits of RNFL variation in different populations. Translational Relevance: This study provides an improved understanding of normal variation in RNFL thickness in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.