Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342581›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Cortical magnification in human visual cortex parallels task performance around the visual field.

Noah C Benson, Eline R Kupers, Antoine Barbot, Marisa Carrasco, Jonathan Winawer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial Frequency Tuning Follows Scale Invariance in the Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effort and salience jointly drive saccade selection.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Article
  17. Asymmetries in Foveal Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Visual adaptation stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian: Linking performance with V1 cortical surface area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noah C BensonDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-8265
Eline R KupersDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4972-5307
Antoine BarbotDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3301-4279
Marisa Carrasco *Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-9056
Jonathan Winawer *Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-5586
New York University · USSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging · NLUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Development and validation of empirical models of the neuronal population activity underlying non-invasive human brain measurementsR01MH111417 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT · PI DEVINSKY, ORRIN, DIJKHUIZEN, RICK M · 2016 to 2020
$4.4M
Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111417NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human vision has striking radial asymmetries, with performance on many tasks varying sharply with stimulus polar angle. Performance is generally better on the horizontal than vertical meridian, and on the lower than upper vertical meridian, and these asymmetries decrease gradually with deviation from the vertical meridian. Here, we report cortical magnification at a fine angular resolution around the visual field. This precision enables comparisons between cortical magnification and behavior, between cortical magnification and retinal cell densities, and between cortical magnification in twin pairs. We show that cortical magnification in the human primary visual cortex, measured in 163 subjects, varies substantially around the visual field, with a pattern similar to behavior. These radial asymmetries in the cortex are larger than those found in the retina, and they are correlated between monozygotic twin pairs. These findings indicate a tight link between cortical topography and behavior, and suggest that visual field asymmetries are partly heritable.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleRetinaTask Performance and AnalysisVision, OcularVisual CortexVisual FieldsYoung Adultcortical magnificationfMRIhumanneuroscienceprimary visual cortexretinotopic mapsvisual performance asymmetries

Identifiers

PMID34342581
PMCPMC8378846
OpenAlexW3190243029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.