Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342535›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

A Multiphase Multiobjective Dynamic Genome-Scale Model Shows Different Redox Balancing among Yeast Species of the

David Henriques, Romain Minebois, Sebastián N Mendoza, Laura G Macías, Roberto Pérez-Torrado, Eladio Barrio, Bas Teusink, Amparo Querol, Eva Balsa-Canto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Screening of flavor-enhancing yeast and its role in fig fermentation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Yeast adapts to diverse ecological niches driven by genomics and metabolic reprogramming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David Henriques(Bio)process Engineering Group, IIM-CSIC, Vigo, Spain.
Romain MineboisSystems Biology in Yeast of Biotechnological Interest, IATA-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.
Sebastián N MendozaSystems Bioinformatics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura G MacíasSystems Biology in Yeast of Biotechnological Interest, IATA-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.
Roberto Pérez-TorradoSystems Biology in Yeast of Biotechnological Interest, IATA-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.
Eladio BarrioDepartment of Genetics, University of Valencia, Burjassot, Spain.
Bas TeusinkSystems Bioinformatics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amparo QuerolSystems Biology in Yeast of Biotechnological Interest, IATA-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.
Eva Balsa-Canto(Bio)process Engineering Group, IIM-CSIC, Vigo, Spain.
Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos · ESVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

CONICYTBecasChile 72180373EraCoBioTech 053.80.733Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) BES-2016-07820Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) PID2019-104113RB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RTI2018-093744-B-C31Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RTI2018-093744-B-C32Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RTI2018-093744-B-C33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeasts constitute over 1,500 species with great potential for biotechnology. Still, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae dominates industrial applications, and many alternative physiological capabilities of lesser-known yeasts are not being fully exploited. While comparative genomics receives substantial attention, little is known about yeasts' metabolic specificity in batch cultures. Here, we propose a multiphase multiobjective dynamic genome-scale model of yeast batch cultures that describes the uptake of carbon and nitrogen sources and the production of primary and secondary metabolites. The model integrates a specific metabolic reconstruction, based on the consensus Yeast8, and a kinetic model describing the time-varying culture environment. In addition, we proposed a multiphase multiobjective flux balance analysis to compute the dynamics of intracellular fluxes. We then compared the metabolism of S. cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum strains in a rich medium fermentation. The model successfully explained the experimental data and brought novel insights into how cryotolerant strains achieve redox balance. The proposed model (along with the corresponding code) provides a comprehensive picture of the main steps occurring inside the cell during batch cultures and offers a systematic approach to prospect or metabolically engineering novel yeast cell factories.

Indexed as

batch fermentationcryotolerant speciesdynamic genome-scale modelsredox balanceSaccharomyces species

Identifiers

PMID34342535
PMCPMC8407324
OpenAlexW3190191127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.