Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34342239›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Spine Surgeons Social Dilemma: Benefits and Risks of Social Media for Spine Surgery Practice in the 21st Century.

Rahul G Samtani, Antonio Webb, John Burleson, Sigurd Berven, Alekos Theologis, Edem Abotsi, Shane Burch, Vedat Deviren, Ram Haddas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social media best practices for the spine care professional.North American Spine Society journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. #lowbackpain on TikTok: A New Frontier for Orthopaedic Medical Education.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul G SamtaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Antonio WebbSouth Texas Spinal Clinic, San Antonio, TX, USA.
John BurlesonHughston Clinic Orthopaedics, Smyma, TN, USA.
Sigurd BervenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alekos TheologisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-9392
Edem AbotsiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shane BurchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Vedat DevirenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ram HaddasTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-5499
University of California, San Francisco · USHughston Clinic · USTexas Back Institute · USTexas Neurology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional observational.

backgroundThe use of social media by providers can enhance patient education, complement offline information, facilitate patient support, stimulate brand building, and strengthen the organization's market position. Risks of social media include, but are not limited to, a lack of quality, reliability, misrepresentation of credentials, influence of hidden and overt conflicts of interest, content that may jeopardize patient privacy, HIPAA regulations, and physicians' credentials and licensure. Physicians' use of social media may also expose him/her to lawsuits if providing specific medical advice on media platforms.

objectiveTo document the social media presence of a broad cohort of spine surgeons, and to discuss the benefits and risks of a social media presence.

methodsCross-sectional observational of 325 Spine Surgeons from 76 institutions across the US. Description statistic and Pearson's correlation were used to investigate the relationships between the variables.

resultsOut of the 325 surgeons, 96% were male with an average age of 51.5 ± 10.7 years and 14.1 ± 9.6 years of experience. The frequency of social media use included 57.2% of surgeons had professional LinkedIn, 17.8% had professional Facebook, and less than 16% had other social media platforms. When combining all platforms together, 64.6% of all surgeons had at least one professional social media platform. 64.0% of these surgeons had no social media activity in the past 90 days, while 19.4% and 10.9% were active once and twice a month, respectively. Surgeon age (

conclusionsGiven the scarcity of research on this topic and the novelty of the platforms, social media and online services continue to be utilized at a low level by spine surgeons. Issues regarding the risks of privacy issues with social media users continue to be a concern among medical professionals adopting this technology. This can largely be mitigated with the combination of physician education and informed consent from patients. The ability to connect with patients directly, and provide access to high-quality education and information will be of considerable benefit to our field well into the future.

Indexed as

internetsocial mediaspine surgeonsspine surgeryWeb 2.0

Identifiers

PMID34342239
PMCPMC10448086
OpenAlexW3193121166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.