Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34341921›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Assessing urban atmospheric environmental efficiency and factors influencing it in China.

Kai Liu, Xiaoyu Wang, Zongbin Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai LiuCollege of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, China. liukaisdnu@163.com.
Xiaoyu WangCollege of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, China.
Zongbin ZhangSchool of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, China. zhangzongbin429@163.com.

Funding

Key Project of Social Science Planning of Shandong Province 20BJJJ06Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province 2020RKB01112National Natural Science Foundation of China 72004124Philosophy and Social Science Project of Jinan City JNSK20C13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With rapid urbanization and industrialization in developing countries, cities have become the major sources of air pollution. Studying urban atmospheric environmental efficiency has an important reference value for the prevention and control of air pollution. This study used data from 267 cities in China between 2001 and 2016 to assess the urban atmospheric environmental efficiency using the super-efficiency slacks-based measure model, to test the spatial characteristics of urban atmospheric environmental efficiency using the spatial autocorrelation method, and to identify factors influencing it using the Geodetector. The results are as follows: (1) The atmospheric environmental efficiency of most cities in China is increasing. The average efficiency in the entire country exhibits an upward "wavy" trend. The average urban atmospheric environmental efficiency in Eastern China is the highest, and that in Western China is the lowest. (2) The urban atmospheric environmental efficiency exhibits the characteristic of global spatial autocorrelation, and high-high and low-low are the main types of efficiency in local spatial autocorrelation. (3) Population density, industrialization, and science and technology are the main factors influencing urban atmospheric environmental efficiency.

Indexed as

Air PollutionChinaCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringSpatial AnalysisUrbanizationGeodetectorInfluencing factorSpatial autocorrelationSpatio-temporal trendSuper-efficiency slacks-based measure modelUrban atmospheric environmental efficiency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.